Joseph Polanik wrote:
no one knows how it happens that there is experience at all; nor, what precisely an experiencer is; so, there may be some foot stamping involved.
Foot stamping has carries no weight when presenting an argument.
what is known is that there is experience and there is experiencing; but, no way to explain that fact without inferring that there is an experiencer. for one example, your own attempt to explain how there is experience without anything that experiences failed miserably.
More foot stamping? Show me where it fails. ========================================== Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
