[Wittrs] Re: Strawson on Experience and Experiencers
- From: "BruceD" <blroadies@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:44:05 -0000
--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Joseph Polanik <jPolanik@...> wrote:
>
> Strawson on Experience and Experiencers
>
> in _Mental Reality_, Second Ed., Galen Strawson quotes Frege as saying
> "An experience is impossible without an experiencer" and then
comments:
>
> "This is a necessary truth. ... There cannot be experience with a
> subject of experience, because experience is necessarily for someone
or
> something --- an experiencer or subject of experience." [p. 129]
Is there a typo here or am I not following this? "There cannot be
experience with a subject of experience"
(without a subject of experience?)
> since this proposition (that experience implies an experiencer)
What is the relationship between the experience and the experiencer?
bruce
=========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
Other related posts:
