[sugpro] Re: Hope I found everyone
- From: Bruce Beck <bbeck7@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: sugpro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:21:17 -0700
I have many issues going back to 12-07
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Kenneth Irving <kenneth.irving@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> That can be of great help. How should we proceed? Any suggestions?
>
> 2015-02-09 19:50 GMT-02:00 <shawn.mchatten@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> I kept all 6800 messages from when I joined back on Feb 12, 2009.
> Coincidence or what. I've culled the 700 messages or so from the last year
> and a half, from Jan 1, 2012 to mid June 2013 when the list shut down. There
> were around 100 contributors in those 700 messages that I can drag the email
> addresses out of if that would help. It will only be those that actually
> posted but might be a start.
>>
>> Shawn
>>
>>
>> On 2015-02-09 16:06, Steve Peterson wrote:
>> > As I said, I did look through the archive for the old list but the
>> > problem was that the list had been so erratic for so many months that
>> > the only archive that remained online only had posts by a few
>> > individuals. IIRC, there had been some problem switching over from an
>> > old server and the really old (and really useful) archive was no
>> > longer available. Now I see that even the archive that I looked
>> > through is no longer online (not surprising, I guess). Dave McCue, if
>> > you can reach him, *might* have some old stuff lying around, but I
>> > wouldn't hold out much hope.
>> >
>> > --Steve
>> >
>> >
>> > On 02/09/2015 12:15 PM, Richard Nakka wrote:
>> >> Dave McCue, former SugPro list moderator, may have those files.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Kenneth Irving <kenneth.irving@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> What happened to the old list files? Are they still available somewhere?
>> >>> Because maybe it could be useful to scrub all the emails from it and send
>> >>> invitations to the former subscribers to join the new list, in case they
>> >>> are
>> >>> interested. I can help with that, but I'd need access to the old list
>> >>> files.
>> >>>
>> >>> 2015-02-09 17:12 GMT-02:00 Steve Peterson <steve_peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> >>>> Only a couple of dozen people have subscribed. I'm sure the link will
>> >>>> help...as will Michael's effort. I'm a noob at list moderation and only
>> >>>> "signed up" to do this because no one else was making any visible
>> >>>> effort to
>> >>>> get the list going again. As for Michael's question about the Freelists
>> >>>> "webpage", I have no idea what Freelists means by that and I haven't
>> >>>> had any
>> >>>> time to really dig down and investigate it. Maybe it should point to
>> >>>> Richard's site--it's got to be the most complete (not to mention
>> >>>> safety-oriented) site out there.
>> >>>> --Steve
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 02/09/2015 09:17 AM, Richard Nakka wrote:
>> >>>>> Steve,
>> >>>>> Just wondering, how many people are currently on this new list? I was
>> >>>>> under the impression that the 'whole group' from SugPro was on
>> >>>>> it....guess I was wrong. I've also been wondering how may people are
>> >>>>> still active in sugar rocketry. I've been particularly active the past
>> >>>>> 6 months or so, immensely enjoying building and launching KNSB
>> >>>>> powered rockets.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I will add a link on my website to the new list.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Richard
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Steve Peterson
>> >>>>> <steve_peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>>>> As the moderator and re-creator of the list, I did once consider
>> >>>>>> trying
>> >>>>>> to
>> >>>>>> contact everyone on the old list but I wasn't able to scavenge enough
>> >>>>>> email
>> >>>>>> addresses from the old list's archive to make it worth the effort. I
>> >>>>>> still
>> >>>>>> hope that people will pass the word along and we'll get most of the
>> >>>>>> old
>> >>>>>> members back. However, I have to say that I'm beginning to wonder just
>> >>>>>> how
>> >>>>>> many people are still active with sugar propellants (or even rocketry
>> >>>>>> in
>> >>>>>> general).
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --Steve
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 02/09/2015 07:59 AM, Kenneth Irving wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Michael: yes, it's a shame that the list list was recreated but the
>> >>>>>> users
>> >>>>>> weren't told or weren't included by default in the new list. That
>> >>>>>> would've
>> >>>>>> simplified everything. A long time has passed and the community has
>> >>>>>> been
>> >>>>>> lost. I hope it can be recreated.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> best regards
>> >>>>>> Kenneth
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 2015-02-09 13:14 GMT-02:00 Michael Monteith
>> >>>>>> <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> >>>>>>> Looks like the old list is gone. I think the biggest problem is
>> >>>>>>> people
>> >>>>>>> don't know how to find this list. If this works maybe I can send to
>> >>>>>>> people
>> >>>>>>> I know and pass the word around.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Michael Monteith
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
