[sugpro] Re: Hope I found everyone
- From: shawn.mchatten@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: sugpro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:17:07 -0500
I will put the email addresses I have in an excel spreadsheet and send
it Steve. He can put together an email to invite them to re-join.
On 2015-02-09 19:06, Kenneth Irving wrote:
> That can be of great help. How should we proceed? Any suggestions?
>
> 2015-02-09 19:50 GMT-02:00 <shawn.mchatten@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> I kept all 6800 messages from when I joined back on Feb 12, 2009.
>> Coincidence or what. I've culled the 700 messages or so from the last year
>> and a half, from Jan 1, 2012 to mid June 2013 when the list shut down. There
>> were around 100 contributors in those 700 messages that I can drag the email
>> addresses out of if that would help. It will only be those that actually
>> posted but might be a start.
>>
>> Shawn
>>
>> On 2015-02-09 16:06, Steve Peterson wrote: > As I said, I did look through
>> the archive for the old list but the > problem was that the list had been so
>> erratic for so many months that > the only archive that remained online only
>> had posts by a few > individuals. IIRC, there had been some problem
>> switching over from an > old server and the really old (and really useful)
>> archive was no > longer available. Now I see that even the archive that I
>> looked > through is no longer online (not surprising, I guess). Dave McCue,
>> if > you can reach him, *might* have some old stuff lying around, but I >
>> wouldn't hold out much hope. > > --Steve > > > On 02/09/2015 12:15 PM,
>> Richard Nakka wrote: >> Dave McCue, former SugPro list moderator, may have
>> those files. >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Kenneth Irving
>> <kenneth.irving@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> What happened to the old list files?
>> Are they still available somewhere? >>> Because maybe it could be useful to
>> scrub all the emails from
it and
send >>> invitations to the former subscribers to join the new list, in case
they are >>> interested. I can help with that, but I'd need access to the old
list files. >>> >>> 2015-02-09 17:12 GMT-02:00 Steve Peterson
<steve_peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>> Only a couple of dozen people have
subscribed. I'm sure the link will >>>> help...as will Michael's effort. I'm a
noob at list moderation and only >>>> "signed up" to do this because no one
else was making any visible effort to >>>> get the list going again. As for
Michael's question about the Freelists >>>> "webpage", I have no idea what
Freelists means by that and I haven't had any >>>> time to really dig down and
investigate it. Maybe it should point to >>>> Richard's site--it's got to be
the most complete (not to mention >>>> safety-oriented) site out there. >>>>
--Steve >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02/09/2015 09:17 AM, Richard Nakka wrote: >>>>>
Steve, >>>>> Just wondering, how many people are currently on this new list? I
was >>>>>
under
the impression that the 'whole group' from SugPro was on >>>>> it....guess I
was wrong. I've also been wondering how may people are >>>>> still active in
sugar rocketry. I've been particularly active the past >>>>> 6 months or so,
immensely enjoying building and launching KNSB >>>>> powered rockets. >>>>>
>>>>> I will add a link on my website to the new list. >>>>> >>>>> Richard
>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Steve Peterson >>>>>
<steve_peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> As the moderator and re-creator of
the list, I did once consider trying >>>>>> to >>>>>> contact everyone on the
old list but I wasn't able to scavenge enough >>>>>> email >>>>>> addresses
from the old list's archive to make it worth the effort. I >>>>>> still >>>>>>
hope that people will pass the word along and we'll get most of the old >>>>>>
members back. However, I have to say that I'm beginning to wonder just >>>>>>
how >>>>>> many people are still active with sugar propellan
ts (or
even rocketry in >>>>>> general). >>>>>> >>>>>> --Steve >>>>>> >>>>>> On
02/09/2015 07:59 AM, Kenneth Irving wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Michael: yes, it's a
shame that the list list was recreated but the >>>>>> users >>>>>> weren't told
or weren't included by default in the new list. That >>>>>> would've >>>>>>
simplified everything. A long time has passed and the community has been >>>>>>
lost. I hope it can be recreated. >>>>>> >>>>>> best regards >>>>>> Kenneth
>>>>>> >>>>>> 2015-02-09 13:14 GMT-02:00 Michael Monteith >>>>>>
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>> Looks like the old list is gone. I think
the biggest problem is people >>>>>>> don't know how to find this list. If this
works maybe I can send to >>>>>>> people >>>>>>> I know and pass the word
around. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Michael Monteith >>>>>>> >>>> >>
Other related posts:
