[sugpro] Re: Hope I found everyone
- From: Kenneth Irving <kenneth.irving@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: sugpro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 22:06:49 -0200
That can be of great help. How should we proceed? Any suggestions?
2015-02-09 19:50 GMT-02:00 <shawn.mchatten@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I kept all 6800 messages from when I joined back on Feb 12, 2009.
> Coincidence or what. I've culled the 700 messages or so from the last year
> and a half, from Jan 1, 2012 to mid June 2013 when the list shut down. There
> were around 100 contributors in those 700 messages that I can drag the email
> addresses out of if that would help. It will only be those that actually
> posted but might be a start.
>
> Shawn
>
>
> On 2015-02-09 16:06, Steve Peterson wrote:
> > As I said, I did look through the archive for the old list but the
> > problem was that the list had been so erratic for so many months that
> > the only archive that remained online only had posts by a few
> > individuals. IIRC, there had been some problem switching over from an
> > old server and the really old (and really useful) archive was no
> > longer available. Now I see that even the archive that I looked
> > through is no longer online (not surprising, I guess). Dave McCue, if
> > you can reach him, *might* have some old stuff lying around, but I
> > wouldn't hold out much hope.
> >
> > --Steve
> >
> >
> > On 02/09/2015 12:15 PM, Richard Nakka wrote:
> >> Dave McCue, former SugPro list moderator, may have those files.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Kenneth Irving <kenneth.irving@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>> What happened to the old list files? Are they still available somewhere?
> >>> Because maybe it could be useful to scrub all the emails from it and send
> >>> invitations to the former subscribers to join the new list, in case they
> >>> are
> >>> interested. I can help with that, but I'd need access to the old list
> >>> files.
> >>>
> >>> 2015-02-09 17:12 GMT-02:00 Steve Peterson <steve_peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>>> Only a couple of dozen people have subscribed. I'm sure the link will
> >>>> help...as will Michael's effort. I'm a noob at list moderation and only
> >>>> "signed up" to do this because no one else was making any visible effort
> >>>> to
> >>>> get the list going again. As for Michael's question about the Freelists
> >>>> "webpage", I have no idea what Freelists means by that and I haven't had
> >>>> any
> >>>> time to really dig down and investigate it. Maybe it should point to
> >>>> Richard's site--it's got to be the most complete (not to mention
> >>>> safety-oriented) site out there.
> >>>> --Steve
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 02/09/2015 09:17 AM, Richard Nakka wrote:
> >>>>> Steve,
> >>>>> Just wondering, how many people are currently on this new list? I was
> >>>>> under the impression that the 'whole group' from SugPro was on
> >>>>> it....guess I was wrong. I've also been wondering how may people are
> >>>>> still active in sugar rocketry. I've been particularly active the past
> >>>>> 6 months or so, immensely enjoying building and launching KNSB
> >>>>> powered rockets.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I will add a link on my website to the new list.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Richard
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Steve Peterson
> >>>>> <steve_peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>> As the moderator and re-creator of the list, I did once consider trying
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>> contact everyone on the old list but I wasn't able to scavenge enough
> >>>>>> email
> >>>>>> addresses from the old list's archive to make it worth the effort. I
> >>>>>> still
> >>>>>> hope that people will pass the word along and we'll get most of the old
> >>>>>> members back. However, I have to say that I'm beginning to wonder just
> >>>>>> how
> >>>>>> many people are still active with sugar propellants (or even rocketry
> >>>>>> in
> >>>>>> general).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --Steve
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 02/09/2015 07:59 AM, Kenneth Irving wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Michael: yes, it's a shame that the list list was recreated but the
> >>>>>> users
> >>>>>> weren't told or weren't included by default in the new list. That
> >>>>>> would've
> >>>>>> simplified everything. A long time has passed and the community has
> >>>>>> been
> >>>>>> lost. I hope it can be recreated.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> best regards
> >>>>>> Kenneth
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2015-02-09 13:14 GMT-02:00 Michael Monteith
> >>>>>> <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>>>>>> Looks like the old list is gone. I think the biggest problem is people
> >>>>>>> don't know how to find this list. If this works maybe I can send to
> >>>>>>> people
> >>>>>>> I know and pass the word around.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Michael Monteith
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>
>
Other related posts:
