[sugpro] Re: Hope I found everyone

  • From: shawn.mchatten@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: sugpro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:50:37 -0500

 

I kept all 6800 messages from when I joined back on Feb 12, 2009.
Coincidence or what. I've culled the 700 messages or so from the last
year and a half, from Jan 1, 2012 to mid June 2013 when the list shut
down. There were around 100 contributors in those 700 messages that I
can drag the email addresses out of if that would help. It will only be
those that actually posted but might be a start.

Shawn

On 2015-02-09 16:06, Steve Peterson wrote:
> As I said, I did look through the archive for the old list but the
> problem was that the list had been so erratic for so many months that
> the only archive that remained online only had posts by a few
> individuals. IIRC, there had been some problem switching over from an
> old server and the really old (and really useful) archive was no
> longer available. Now I see that even the archive that I looked
> through is no longer online (not surprising, I guess). Dave McCue, if
> you can reach him, *might* have some old stuff lying around, but I
> wouldn't hold out much hope.
> 
> --Steve
> 
> 
> On 02/09/2015 12:15 PM, Richard Nakka wrote:
>> Dave McCue, former SugPro list moderator, may have those files.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Kenneth Irving <kenneth.irving@xxxxxxxxx> 
>> wrote:
>>> What happened to the old list files? Are they still available somewhere?
>>> Because maybe it could be useful to scrub all the emails from it and send
>>> invitations to the former subscribers to join the new list, in case they are
>>> interested. I can help with that, but I'd need access to the old list files.
>>>
>>> 2015-02-09 17:12 GMT-02:00 Steve Peterson <steve_peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> Only a couple of dozen people have subscribed. I'm sure the link will
>>>> help...as will Michael's effort. I'm a noob at list moderation and only
>>>> "signed up" to do this because no one else was making any visible effort to
>>>> get the list going again. As for Michael's question about the Freelists
>>>> "webpage", I have no idea what Freelists means by that and I haven't had 
>>>> any
>>>> time to really dig down and investigate it. Maybe it should point to
>>>> Richard's site--it's got to be the most complete (not to mention
>>>> safety-oriented) site out there.
>>>> --Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02/09/2015 09:17 AM, Richard Nakka wrote:
>>>>> Steve,
>>>>> Just wondering, how many people are currently on this new list? I was
>>>>> under the impression that the 'whole group' from SugPro was on
>>>>> it....guess I was wrong. I've also been wondering how may people are
>>>>> still active in sugar rocketry. I've been particularly active the past
>>>>> 6 months or so, immensely enjoying building and launching KNSB
>>>>> powered rockets.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will add a link on my website to the new list.
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Steve Peterson
>>>>> <steve_peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> As the moderator and re-creator of the list, I did once consider trying
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> contact everyone on the old list but I wasn't able to scavenge enough
>>>>>> email
>>>>>> addresses from the old list's archive to make it worth the effort. I
>>>>>> still
>>>>>> hope that people will pass the word along and we'll get most of the old
>>>>>> members back. However, I have to say that I'm beginning to wonder just
>>>>>> how
>>>>>> many people are still active with sugar propellants (or even rocketry in
>>>>>> general).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Steve
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 02/09/2015 07:59 AM, Kenneth Irving wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael: yes, it's a shame that the list list was recreated but the
>>>>>> users
>>>>>> weren't told or weren't included by default in the new list. That
>>>>>> would've
>>>>>> simplified everything. A long time has passed and the community has been
>>>>>> lost. I hope it can be recreated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> best regards
>>>>>> Kenneth
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2015-02-09 13:14 GMT-02:00 Michael Monteith
>>>>>> <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>> Looks like the old list is gone. I think the biggest problem is people
>>>>>>> don't know how to find this list. If this works maybe I can send to
>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>> I know and pass the word around.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Michael Monteith
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
 

Other related posts: