[rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:56:39 GMT
Well said Peter, while I have nothing against digi, the longer one needs to
complete the image process, the more one needs to THINK about every stage of
the process. It is the "inconvenience" of the film process that contributes to
its quality in the hands of a competent technician/artist.
Sent via BlackBerry® from 3
-----Original Message-----
From: "iusar4s@xxxxxxxx" <iusar4s@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:37:40
To:rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
Comparing film to digital is like comparing the NY Philharmonic to a state of
the art rock synthesizer. One is cheaper, faster, and more convenient; the
other is high art.
Peter Nebergall
Other related posts:
