[rollei_list] Re: [OT] film vs digital
- From: J Patric Dahlén <jenspatricdahlen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:06:59 +0000
Peter Nebergall wrote:
Comparing film to digital is like comparing the NY Philharmonic to a state
> of the art rock synthesizer. One is cheaper, faster, and more
convenient;
> the other is high art.
Very well said, Peter!
I own a digital compact camera, but I don't like to use it to take photos of
my loved ones... Instead I use it for fast documentation and when I need
photos of something to show on the internet/send with email...
There are more feelings involved when I use my cameras for film, and work in
the darkroom. Then I feel creative. I can always digitalize film/prints when
I want or need to. Digital has it's place, of course, even for me.
/Patric
_________________________________________________________________
Trött på att pendla? - Sök jobb där du bor! http://jobb.msn.monster.se/
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
