If done correctly. Otherwise, it can be too dark and flat. Good work demands effort. I am partial to film and the darkroom, too. I heard part of report on public radio yesterday where the filmmaker used film and was expected to by his backers even though it cost more. It may be that a good compromise is shooting with film, scanning, editing in photoshop and then having a negative made to size and then contact printing. Excellent images demand lots of work.
Doug On Jul 19, 2007, at 8:37 PM, iusar4s@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Comparing film to digital is like comparing the NY Philharmonic to a state of the art rock synthesizer. One is cheaper, faster, and more convenient; the other is high art.Peter Nebergall
--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
