On 27/09/06, Praveen Kumar <praveen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't think that munging "reply-to" header is requested unanimously. I
know several other people on the list who don't want "reply-to" header
munging (like me). They are in silent mode because they are tired of the
flame wars in the past on this topic.
I think that the user's freedom of selecting what should be done about
his reply should remain intact. Also the poster's choice of "reply-to"
field should be maintained and passed on. A lot of mail clients do have
the option of "Reply list". When given an option to deal with things in
the front-end level, why to have a workaround at the mail headers?
