2011/5/4 Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Are we instead now going to define our workflow around the tool that will >> win the vote? > > Well I didn't want to seem like a "sore loser" by saying "hahahaha, > screw all you people who voted for Mercurial, Oliver says we can't use > it!" > > If Mercurial truly is not an option then the vote is moot and we > should just use Git. Hehe, nice try ;-P