On Wed, 04 May 2011 22:50:59 +0200 "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 04 May 2011 18:02:18 +0200, Ryan Leavengood > > > <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > > how we work. Saying Haiku revision 4d5b6789 is not as pretty as > > > > Haiku > > > > r43215 but it isn't unworkable. > > I'm very against dropping sequential revision numbers; I've already > filled the archive with a number of arguments and opinions on that, > though :-) > In any case, before we do that, I would say we should just stick with > SVN, and let everyone who wants to use a DVCS use it over the existing > bridges (I don't mean our read-only clone, but git-svn for example). "Stone him! Stone him!" ;-) Seriously, though. The problem with prematurely started votes is that some options might not be available. CU, Ingo