>If we make comments on current set of SDK's we will arrive in Januaray 2004 >without having done nothing. And maybe we will have brought more discredit >to the GMPI group because some too much hard criticism about major SDK's . its mid-september. the mailing list started in mid-february. that's 7 months so far. we've actually done a lot, but progress has slowed down a lot as time drags on. i suspect that if people were motivated, we could be done with a review in 4 weeks. i suspect Marc P. would be happy to do the CoreAudio review, i'd happily do the VST one although i'm not the most obviously qualified person to tackle it, i'm sure Steve H. would be willing to tackle the LADSPA one (the simplest of the lot). that means we would need reviewers for: * TDM * RTAS * MAS * DirectX * Rewire? DirectConnect? the reviews could be posted anonymously if people are worried about corporate relations and all that. or you can forward them all to me and i'll rewrite them in my own style. i have no bridges to burn :) >> and what's in that base? > >This is simple to find if you are focused on a minimal goal : host (2 tracks >, 1 master) wants to insert a plug-in (Delay / Gain) . If you do that , you >get your base. I (and most of the people there) can program that badly in 2 the point is: loads of people have already done this!! we've got lots of examples of what happens when people sit down and do this. the problem: nobody thinks that any of the results are so much better than any of the others that its worth supporting as a GMPI-like standard (well, this is one of the problems). this is despite significant issues with various aspects of each API, and the general proprietary nature of just about all of them. why would the result of a group of people from this list working on the exact same problem be any different? i think that the last thing we want is another plugin API written without a clear model of what the goals are. --p ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe