[geocentrism] Re: Hello, group.

  • From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:06:07 -0000

Dear Cheryl,
If you send me your address I'll send you a copy of Neville's 'Geocenric
Universe 2.2' CD. This is a brilliant animation of a geocentric cosmos and
it is interactive. I've checked with Neville and he said it was OK.

Jack


----- Original Message -----
From: "Cheryl B." <c.battles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 1:42 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Hello, group.


> Thanks.  Could you explain the geocentrist model to me as simply as
> possible?  Is it as simple as that the earth is not moving and everything
is
> going around us once every 24 hours?  So that means the astronauts on the
> moon would see what appears to be a revolving earth, going around once in
24
> hours.
>
> So where does the 28 days come in?
>
> Cheryl
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gary Shelton" <garylshelton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 8:30 PM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Hello, group.
>
>
> > Cheryl,
> >
> > You need a good dose of Bad Astronomy.  The folks there will gladly
> clarify
> > any relative motion questions you have.  But I suggest you browse
through
> a
> > couple of topics that I participated in last year.  You will notice I
> > thought like yourself in the beginning.
> >
> > The first is a topic that I actually started, unbelievable as that seems
> to
> > me now....
> >
> > "Relative Motion Falls Apart When applied to Planes"
> >
>
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=16726&postdays=0&postorder
> =asc&start=0
> >
> > The next is a topic begun by a devout acentrist athiest named Maksutov.
> >
> > "Thinking about geocentrism"
> >
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?p=350240&highlight=#350240
> >
> > I did not agree with these people but I could not counter their superior
> > academic arguments.  Still, it was interesting taking the battle to
"their
> > turf".  I personally believe that they made some good points and we need
> to
> > be able to answer all of them, just as the creationists have a counter
to
> > every single evolution premise put forward.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Gary Shelton
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Cheryl B." <c.battles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:31 AM
> > Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Hello, group.
> >
> >
> > > A friend told me the whole moon landing thing was staged in Las Vegas,
> > that
> > > the film crew all had untimely deaths later, and they were pacified
with
> > > hookers and parties during hte shoot.
> > >
> > > If they did go to the moon I'd like to know why not one single
astronaut
> > has
> > > commented about observing the earth turning.  I realize that it takes
12
> > > hours for one side of the earth to completely move around, but it
would
> > > still be apparent to anyone looking that the earth was turning.
> > >
> > > If you went to the moon and believed the earth was turning, wouldn't
you
> > > want to brag about having seen it with your own two eyes?
> > >
> > > Cheryl
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 2/14/05
> >
> >
>
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. geocentrism
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2005