[geocentrism] Re: Hello, group.

  • From: "Cheryl B." <c.battles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 11:26:16 -0500

Dr. Jones -- I had read the thing about the golden triangle and the
proportionate distances between the planets.  But for example a double-helix
orbit of  the sun would be quite a departure from Copernicus' model.   In
your opinion, is there absolutely nothing that could be observed from
another vantage point that would offer some kind of clue, any clue at all,
as to what's happening?

For example, couldn't  either Voyager space probe be filming things that
might tell us something?  (assuming of course that there really are Voyager
space probes, but let's assume there are.  Assuming that, what could they
see if anything that would tell us anything?  I want an answer to this
question so I can go to NASA and make them explain to me why they aren't at
least trying to document what is or is not happening re all of this stuff.)

Cheryl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 11:10 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Hello, group.


> Cheryl,
>
> Take a look at Steven's page, "Flower Pattern Discovery," under "The
Universe," on
> www.midclyth.supanet.com
>
> The mathematics is absolutely IDENTICAL for each image. This destroys the
acentric myth quite nicely.
>
> Neville.
>
> "Cheryl B." <c.battles@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Gary and everyone -- I still want to know, is there nothing at all that
can
> be observed from another vantage point (besides Earth) that would reveal a
> clue as to what is really happening? Would everything be what we already
> see but in reverse? Since there are so many other models that could
> explain what's happening, can it possibly be true that taking another
> vantage point (i.e. as from Voyager or the moon) -- where we are far
enough
> away to see the earth in its entirety, where we could discover something
> about the orbits of ANYTHING?
>
> It would not be possible to determine that the earth was not moving but
> everything else WAS?
>
> Surely this can't be so!
>
> ---------------------------------
>  ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
>
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. geocentrism
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2005