[geocentrism] Re: Hello, group.

  • From: "Cheryl B." <c.battles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 03:00:18 -0500

BTW, what is your address?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 1:06 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Hello, group.


> Dear Cheryl,
> If you send me your address I'll send you a copy of Neville's 'Geocenric
> Universe 2.2' CD. This is a brilliant animation of a geocentric cosmos and
> it is interactive. I've checked with Neville and he said it was OK.
>
> Jack
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cheryl B." <c.battles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 1:42 AM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Hello, group.
>
>
> > Thanks.  Could you explain the geocentrist model to me as simply as
> > possible?  Is it as simple as that the earth is not moving and
everything
> is
> > going around us once every 24 hours?  So that means the astronauts on
the
> > moon would see what appears to be a revolving earth, going around once
in
> 24
> > hours.
> >
> > So where does the 28 days come in?
> >
> > Cheryl
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gary Shelton" <garylshelton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 8:30 PM
> > Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Hello, group.
> >
> >
> > > Cheryl,
> > >
> > > You need a good dose of Bad Astronomy.  The folks there will gladly
> > clarify
> > > any relative motion questions you have.  But I suggest you browse
> through
> > a
> > > couple of topics that I participated in last year.  You will notice I
> > > thought like yourself in the beginning.
> > >
> > > The first is a topic that I actually started, unbelievable as that
seems
> > to
> > > me now....
> > >
> > > "Relative Motion Falls Apart When applied to Planes"
> > >
> >
>
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=16726&postdays=0&postorder
> > =asc&start=0
> > >
> > > The next is a topic begun by a devout acentrist athiest named
Maksutov.
> > >
> > > "Thinking about geocentrism"
> > >
> http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?p=350240&highlight=#350240
> > >
> > > I did not agree with these people but I could not counter their
superior
> > > academic arguments.  Still, it was interesting taking the battle to
> "their
> > > turf".  I personally believe that they made some good points and we
need
> > to
> > > be able to answer all of them, just as the creationists have a counter
> to
> > > every single evolution premise put forward.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Gary Shelton
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Cheryl B." <c.battles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:31 AM
> > > Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Hello, group.
> > >
> > >
> > > > A friend told me the whole moon landing thing was staged in Las
Vegas,
> > > that
> > > > the film crew all had untimely deaths later, and they were pacified
> with
> > > > hookers and parties during hte shoot.
> > > >
> > > > If they did go to the moon I'd like to know why not one single
> astronaut
> > > has
> > > > commented about observing the earth turning.  I realize that it
takes
> 12
> > > > hours for one side of the earth to completely move around, but it
> would
> > > > still be apparent to anyone looking that the earth was turning.
> > > >
> > > > If you went to the moon and believed the earth was turning, wouldn't
> you
> > > > want to brag about having seen it with your own two eyes?
> > > >
> > > > Cheryl
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 2/14/05
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. geocentrism
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2005