Richard Hughes wrote:
Yup, I think I would be more militant than you if the decision were mine; for instance, does anything other than argyll tools use jncf? Because if that is removed, you can remove yajl which is thousands of lines of code less to ship.
If you're going to remove notable functionality by removing jncf, then please rename your fork to something distinct (ie., not anything with "argyll" in it). Graeme Gill.
