On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Pascal de Bruijn wrote: > >> However, please do note, I did include a small patch, to extra smooth >> the shapers... > > Hi, > I'm not very happy about the idea that there is something > called "ArgyllCMS 1.1.0 RC2" out there that doesn't actually behave > exactly like ArgyllCMS 1.1.0 RC2. Could you provide the test case(s) that > prompted this change (or point them out to me) please ? Did you notice > that I made a change in this area (xicc/xfit.c) between RC1 and RC2 ? > How did that affect your test case(s) ? It definately worked well for 1.0.3/4... It's just the XBASE_SHAPE times 10... Anyway, I always clearly tag my packages with my nickname, and provide a decent changelog. Regards, Pascal de Bruijn