2009/12/10 Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > I'm not very happy about the idea that there is something > called "ArgyllCMS 1.1.0 RC2" out there that doesn't actually behave > exactly like ArgyllCMS 1.1.0 RC2. I'm thinking of doing the same for Fedora -- pushing in the udev changes, ripping out the custom libusb stuff and that sort of thing. Would it be okay for me to generate a tarball called hargyll-1.1.0-rc2? so people don't get confused? I can use any other prefix or suffix (or name) if you want. I _don't_ want to fork Argyll, I just wanting a single UNIXy tarball that I can sync with your releases every few months that is suitable for distros to just slurp up. Richard.