[antispam-f] Re: SecureSockets
- From: Harriet Bazley <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 23:30:34 GMT
On 13 Feb 2019 as I do recall,
Frank de Bruijn wrote:
On 13 Feb in article <00eb6a8557.harriet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Harriet Bazley <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
the answer to the question as to how SecureSockets is getting loaded
at all is that Hermes is being run to send mail after the end of the
fetch
and after that, AS *should* run fine AS LONG AS IT IS RESTARTED (or the
settings are reloaded). It only looks for the module when the settings
are loaded or when the Module? button in the Choices window is clicked.
Ah - I think that explains it, then (or at least the behaviour I was
seeing where manually running the !RunImage produced different results).
That would count as 'restarting' AntiSpam after running Hermes, after
which neither version (the app having also been restarted after that!)
would experience any problems.
And indeed a quick test with re-running the application proves that it
does.
What it doesn't explain is why this set-up didn't produce errors
previously, which I suspect may have been because at some point prior to
this functionality's being introduced into AntiSpam (or required by that
mailbox) I had somehow set up Hermes to do an automatic send of queued
mail before AntiSpam was being run, and that was in the other machine's
!Boot sequence, which I *didn't* copy across along with the Internet
software.
Ah well, now to try to fix it (or look for the other module....)
--
Harriet Bazley == Loyaulte me lie ==
I mean to live forever - or die trying!
Other related posts:
