[geocentrism] Re: Ancient calendars

  • From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:22:17 -0000

Hi Carl, welcome to the forum. I look forward to whatever you offer for our
edification.

In Christ

Jack Lewis (UK)


----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Felland" <cfelland@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 8:48 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Ancient calendars


> Neville, Steven, and group,
> By way of introduction, I am trained as an Entomologist (Ph.D.
> Mississippi State University, 1989) and was employed by Pennsylvania
> State University for ten years before opting for a more Biblical
> lifestyle in Arkansas.  I have espoused most of the viewpoints of
> Institute of Creation Research through graduate school and beyond.  I
> feel that my contribution to creation understanding is a demonstration
> that the Hebrew alphabet is formed around the words 'Israel' and 'Zion.'
> 'Creation Ex Nihilo Technical Journal' rejected the paper, but I have
> put it online (http://yahuah.org/IZCentral.html).
>
> My family and I began to observe a solar/lunar "Creation calendar" (Gen.
> 1: 14) about a year ago in which the 6 working days, weekly Sabbaths,
> and New Moon Days are mutually exclusive (Eze. 46: 1, 3).  Through
> others who are observing this calendar I was introduced to the geostatic
> world view.  I have perused your web site, look forward to your new CD,
> and have been following the discussions on this list.
>
> I recently read Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision and noted his ancient
> calendar study pointing to a 360 day year in the past.  This, plus the
> prophetic 360 day year of the Scriptures, leads me to wonder if the
> current length of the year is different from that at creation or whether
> the 360 day calendar is based on something else.  Velikovsky argued that
> the Plagues and Joshua's long day were a result of brushes with comets
> and that the hail that fell in both was likely meteors.  He argued that
> it was the earth's rotation that was altered.  Does the geostatic
> position allow for "natural" explanations for the cataclysmic events in
> earth history?  Does the geostatic position allow for a change in the
> length of the solar year?
>
> C. M. Felland
>
>
>


Other related posts: