I think that there were two engineers working for Foxboro who came up with the idea of a programmable logic controller and left to form Modicon. > From: paul.mcquaid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:25:54 -0600 > Subject: Re: [foxboro] FBM232 Modbus Setup Issues > > True...... The fable, as told to me was that Modicon, now part of Schneider > electric - Process automation by the way, originally had this as a > proprietaryprotocol hence the JBUS development but they (Modicon) > relinquished that status and it became an industry open standard, the rest > they say is history....... > > Best Regards > > Paul McQuaid > > -----Original Message----- > From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Brown, Stanley > Sent: 06 March 2015 15:17 > To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [foxboro] FBM232 Modbus Setup Issues > > If I am not mistaken, the reason ModBus is so widely used to is that Modicon > chose to not make it proprietary. An early example of why Open Source is so > successful. Other's such as AB with their DF1 protocol, did I think enforce > IP restrictions. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stan Brown [mailto:stanb@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of McQuaid, Paul > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 03:48 AM > To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [foxboro] FBM232 Modbus Setup Issues > > I was once told, many many years ago, in a galaxy far far away.... oops > getting carried away.... > > That there was a protocol called JBUS it wasn't Modbus but, I understand was > an early attempt to get past IPR. An "almost" identical protocol as Modbus > but incremented by 1 Some manufacturers at one time mistakenly used JBUS > addressing but called it Modbus......so I was led to believe anyway..... > > Best Regards > > Paul McQuaid > > -----Original Message----- > From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Kinsinger, Matthew R > Sent: 05 March 2015 14:44 > To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [foxboro] FBM232 Modbus Setup Issues > > There are plenty of free Modbus and Modbus TCP readers you can install to > test communication to the device from your PC. ModPoll or something to that > affect I remember working well when I needed it. Try a register in the middle > of 3 registers you think exist. I've found far too many devices you have to > shift the register number by 1 in either direction to match up with the > stated register number. > > Matt Kinsinger > mkinsinger@xxxxxxx > 330-825-1208 office > 330-472-1454 ppg cell > > -----Original Message----- > From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Badura, Tom > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 9:38 AM > To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [foxboro] FBM232 Modbus Setup Issues > > Maks, > > A few items we ran into when getting or ModbusTCP started. The symptoms > sound like you are trying to access a bad address in the device. Do you have > DCI READY (on ECB201 display and System Management) prior to connecting the > DCI blocks? > > As stated in a few other replies, you need to verify that all addresses > (registers, coils, etc.) requested by the FBM232 ModbusTCP driver actually > exist in the device. Note that the driver will by default issue one command > for all contiguous registers where possible. I.E. if you create a DCI block > for Modbus register 1 (40001) and another for Modbus register 100 (40100) the > FBM will issue a read/write multiple register command for all 100 registers > (40001 through 40100). If not all 100 registers actually exist in the device > it will respond with an error. The way around this is to create and load a > Device File that specifies the specific addresses available in the device > (DVOPTS = MODBUS+XML). Note also that some devices have an offset of +/-1 in > the address specified in Foxboro verses the address in the device. > > One other item we ran into is that by default the Foxboro ModbusTCP driver > uses Unit ID 255 which should specify any/all units. We have one brand of > PLC that did not like this and we had to specify Unit 1 (DVNAME = > IP.Address/1). As I recall this should up as a problem even before trying to > connect DCI blocks. > > > Tom Badura > Plastics Engineering Company > tbadura@xxxxxxxxxx > > -----Original Message----- > From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Maks Wilde > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 8:12 AM > To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [foxboro] FBM232 Modbus Setup Issues > > Normand/Dirk, > Thank you for your replies. The device I'm trying to communicate with is a > Smith Meter Accuload III. Not sure if anyone has experience with these. > They have a lot of options on the device end of things and we're trying to > see if maybe something is not set right for the FDSI to communicate with it. > At this point I can't even read a single coil from it without faulting the > ECB201 block. > > Any other suggestions are very welcome :) > > Maks Wilde > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your > own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join > to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your > own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join > to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. > ______________________________________________________________________ > > *** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or attached > files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is > addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally > privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its > status. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete > this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any > purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your > own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join > to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave > > > > ________________________________ > > The information contained in this message and any attached files may be > privileged and/or confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not > the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any > of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please so notify > the sender immediately without reading it. Also, please promptly destroy the > original transmission and its attachments. Any views or opinions presented in > this message or attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily > represent those of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation or its > subsidiaries. > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your > own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join > to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. > ______________________________________________________________________ > > *** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or attached > files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is > addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally > privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its > status. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete > this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any > purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at > your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join > to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave > _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave