Digital can be very cheap or very expensive or anywhere in between, just like film. It depends upon what your requirements are and how many options you want... I know digital shooters who function very well with less than a thousand dollars in capital costs and produce impressive large-scale prints with which they are very satisfied... You do not need a dSLR, computer or printer to effectively shoot digital... Eric Goldstein -- On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And how much were his conversion costs. How much did he pay for the digital > camera? How much for the new computer? How much for the new printer? How > much for the fancy inks and spiffy paper? And what about the need to > upgrade every six months or so? Film is cheap and film processing is cheap. > Digital is EXPENSIVE and really inconvenient. > > Marc --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list