[rollei_list] Re: age old "digital vs film" debate...again...was RE: OT Ancient Computers

  • From: Douglas Nygren <dnygr@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:40:59 -0500

Who cares.

On Jan 13, 2009, at 9:21 PM, Peter K. wrote:

Disagree. I can shoot At ISOs 3200, 6400, 12,800 and 25,600 and change from one to another between images. Please show me a film that can do this.

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Let me add low-light shooting as #3 on your list...


 Eric Goldstein

 --

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Gene Johnson <genej2ster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On reflection, there ARE a lot of ways in which digital cameras have become > superior to film cameras.  Convenience and operating cost are 2. (snipped)
---
 Rollei List

 - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
 in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

 - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

 - Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list




--
Peter K
Ó¿Õ¬

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: