[rollei_list] Re: age old "digital vs film" debate...again...was RE: OT Ancient Computers

  • From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:21:12 -0800

Disagree. I can shoot At ISOs 3200, 6400, 12,800 and 25,600 and change from
one to another between images. Please show me a film that can do this.

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Let me add low-light shooting as #3 on your list...
>
>
> Eric Goldstein
>
> --
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Gene Johnson <genej2ster@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > On reflection, there ARE a lot of ways in which digital cameras have
> become
> > superior to film cameras.  Convenience and operating cost are 2.
> (snipped)
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>


-- 
Peter K
Ó¿Õ¬

Other related posts: