[rollei_list] Re: age old digital vs film debate...again...was RE: OT Ancient Computers
- From: jon.stanton@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:16:17 +0000
I have a friend/tax client whose tax returns I have prepared for years that
"converted" from film to digital. His film and processing costs dropped from
just over $20k to $400...he wondered why he owed taxes! (He refuses to pay
quarterly estimates) This is a guy that swore with his right hand on the NYT
(Holy Scripture in his mind) that he would NEVER -EVER go digital...Then his
clients required it...
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Hi Austin,
> For the Motor racing Pros I know who send loads of files back to their
> magazines it is much cheaper, but more work. One told me he could save
> the cost of 5 new cameras per year in film costs alone. OTOH it is
> more work for them. In the old days at the end of practice they were
> the first to the beach, film stashed in a bag. Now they are straight
> to the pressroom to download.
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
