[projectaon] Re: Grand Master comment period [Books 15-20]

  • From: Jonathan Blake <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:08:04 -0700

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This week being a whole lot less busy, I've actually got time to respond
> straight away.
>
>
> On 21/08/2012 23:10, Jonathan Blake wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> BOOK 17:
>>
>>
>>> (er) 180: then turn to -> turn to
>>
>>
>> Already fixed? If so it doesn't have an errata entry.
>
>
> Hmm. Might be fixed already in xml, but it's definitely an erratum and
> present in the final option (then turn to 268) in the test area.
> <http://www.projectaon.org/test/en/xhtml/lw/17tdoi/sect180.htm>

I checked again, and you're right. It wasn't fixed in XML. I should
have triple checked. Anyway, this is non-standard but not incorrect.
It works as a sentence.

--
Jon

~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon


Other related posts: