On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This week being a whole lot less busy, I've actually got time to respond > straight away. > > > On 21/08/2012 23:10, Jonathan Blake wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> BOOK 17: >> >> >>> (er) 180: then turn to -> turn to >> >> >> Already fixed? If so it doesn't have an errata entry. > > > Hmm. Might be fixed already in xml, but it's definitely an erratum and > present in the final option (then turn to 268) in the test area. > <http://www.projectaon.org/test/en/xhtml/lw/17tdoi/sect180.htm> I checked again, and you're right. It wasn't fixed in XML. I should have triple checked. Anyway, this is non-standard but not incorrect. It works as a sentence. -- Jon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon