perhaps the pot can be changed to -in between the JFTs and battery feed thro 4K7 On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 10:00 AM, pakdeDar <pakdedarmantaoye@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > How about other spec required for this kind of mixer Joe ? I learn much > from this discussion that high JFET Idss was specified as J310, BW10 but > not MPF102 or other General FET .. > > Just a question from unexperienced builder..hihi.. > > Sudarmanta - YC1DCN > > Send from my TelakaspaBerrylayauw ® > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Street <jstreet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sender: minima-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:20:37 > To: <minima@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reply-To: minima@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [minima] Re: KISS Mixer Musings > > SST/U401 VGSth matched to within 5mv > > > On 28/02/2014 11:13 PM, Joe Street wrote: > > Why not look for a monolithic pair? If they are fabricated on the > > same substrate the characteristics should be well matched. I haven't > > looked but surely there must be something off the shelf? > > > > On 28/02/2014 7:54 PM, Tayloe, Dan (NSN - US/Tempe) wrote: > >> We need to bias the jfet channel for 50% on, 50% off. When a jfet is > >> "on", it grounds its winding with its phasing for RF to IF transfer. > >> Alternating jfets flips the signal to the opposite polarity. Rapidly > >> flipping the signal polarity through this stage at the LO rate does > >> the mixing. > >> > >> Thus there is no DC current, but we are trying to turn on/off AC > >> paths. Since jfet pinch off thresholds vary so much from device to > >> device, separate bias is best. > >> > >> As a matter of fact, if you had a bunch of these, it would be nice to > >> match Idss and pinchoff voltage for these two jfets. > >> > >> - Dan > >> > >> Sent from my Windows Phone > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: ext Joe Street > >> Sent: 2/28/2014 5:10 PM > >> To: minima@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: [minima] Re: KISS Mixer Musings > >> > >> These FETs are not really 'biased' in the normal sense anyways because > >> the drains are open circuit for DC so there is no bias current flowing. > >> What you are doing is raising and lowering the potential of the whole > >> channel. Variation in the device fabrication processes result in device > >> to device variance in transconductance so perhaps in this strange > >> circuit balance is more important?? > >> > >> On 28/02/2014 4:58 PM, Tayloe, Dan (NSN - US/Tempe) wrote: > >>> That might change the balance of the mixer, but does not change the > >>> bias on each gate. > >>> > >>> - Dan > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: minima-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> [mailto:minima-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Sandeep Lohia > >>> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 2:56 PM > >>> To: minima@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> Subject: [minima] Re: KISS Mixer Musings > >>> > >>> > http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-fIABMtTpyUE/Ut9yfPotc0I/AAAAAAAAAUQ/IG6TveVonrw/s1600/under+R&D.jpg > >>> > >>> > >>> NOTE : not yet tested live... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> IF you have two separate bias pots, > >>>> You could bias the two JFETs with separate pots and adjust for > >>>> similar drain > >>>> Just thinking about this. I remember that the transconductance of > >>>> JFETS > >>>> varies quite a bit so the fact that the signals are not symetrical > >>>> might > >>>> be due to an imbalance in the device characteristics? > >>>>>>> Please take a look at the link and then any volunteers who can try > >>>>>>> and explain this to me most welcome! > >> > > > > -- Regards Sarma