[lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- From: Judy Evans <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:43:53 +0100
Thursday, July 1, 2004, 5:38:54 AM, Scribe1865@xxxxxxx wrote:
A.A.> If there was any substance to it, would the Rabid Right not be
A.A.> exploiting it? What's missing here?
>EY: You are missing the fact that it actually happened.
*So* -- as Andy says -- why is it (whatever "it" is, and there does
seem some doubt) used against Clinton?
I can think of two possibilities (there'll be others)
1) it ("it") didn't happen
2) it ("it") did happen, but as Reagan and Bush Sr did "it" too
(apparently a somewhat different "it", but still involving selling
arms or part-armaments to China, it would be *very silly indeed* to
rang about Clinton doing "it".
I'd put my money on 2)
EY> People think we only helped arm Saddam. We help arm almost all of
EY> our potential foes.
So why finger Clinton?
Judy mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
