[lit-ideas] Re: Barnett's Blueprint for Action

  • From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:20:45 -0400

"He sees America?s military as guaranteeing security to such nations so that 
timid investors will feel safe about investing money."

Except in Iraq, where the American military can't even guarantee it's own 
security.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: Lawrence Helm 
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 9/11/2006 2:14:35 AM 
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Barnett's Blueprint for Action


Eric,

No, I don?t recall his mentioning the depletion of oil reserves, but I?m not 
sure he sees that as a problem.  If a Middle Eastern nation presently dependent 
upon income from oil moves into the functioning core then it will have other 
sources of revenue.  He sees America?s military as guaranteeing security to 
such nations so that timid investors will feel safe about investing money.  
Once investment begins, economy grows probably under an autocratic regime and 
eventually (and this is in agreement with Fukuyama) a democracy is created.  
I?m guessing that Barnett might see the eventual oil depletion as just another 
opportunity for entrepreneur?s to generate new wealth -- by means of alternate 
fuel sources, vehicles, etc.

Other related posts: