Eric, If you go to Thomas Barnett's sight and scroll down, you'll find <http://www.booktv.org/ram/afterwords/1005/arc_btv102905_4.ram> Watch Thomas P.M. Barnett interviewed by Rep. Tom Feeney (R-FL) on "After Words" This is a CSPAN 2 interview with Barnett having to do with his new book, Blueprint for Action, which you can view on RealPlayer. While this interview would answer Andreas' questions about how Barnett's process would end in World Peace, I've essentially already answered those questions in previous notes and he has responded to them without reading them; so I don't think Andreas has the objectivity necessary to watch this 58 minute interview. But you do. One of the most provocative elements in this interview is that Barnett thinks we ought to let Iran have nuclear weapons. He presents a powerful argument for this point of view. I believe that whenever we discussed the question, I used some term like "if it is truly unacceptable that Iran have nuclear weapons, then we should be prepared to bomb them if they are close to obtaining those weapons." Perhaps I didn't say that every time, but I probably said it fairly often. Which is to say that I did have some doubt about how much danger a nuclear Iran would represent; so I wasn't hostile to what Barnett had to say. However the Iranian leaders have expressed the wish to see Israel destroyed and Barnett seemed rather weak on what he thought Israel might do. Lawrence