http://sonicimages.com/webdata/soundtracks/outerlimits/snd/outerlimits-16.MP 2 Irene/Andy, What I'm impressed with is that I sent a note to Eric, because of our previous discussions about Iran, and you responded, Irene/Andy, as though I sent the note to you. I know that "Eric" speculated that Jack Spratt might be one of your pseudonyms or alternate personalities, but, but, but, could that have been a smoke screen? Could all this time Andy, er, Irene have been one, that is two of Eric's alternate personalities? Perhaps this whole pseudonym business is more monstrous and diabolical than we realized . . . http://sonicimages.com/webdata/soundtracks/outerlimits/snd/outerlimits-16.MP 2 Lawrence _____ From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andy Amago Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 5:54 PM To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Barnett's Blueprint for Action I'm responding based on what I know. I thought you'd be impressed. I'm technologically challenged. I'll see if I can watch him tomorrow. ----- Original Message ----- From: Lawrence <mailto:lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Helm To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: 9/9/2006 8:48:31 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Barnett's Blueprint for Action Which means, you are once again responding to one of my notes without reading it, or in this case watching it. The link comes up when I click on it, but you can go to the Thomas Barnett site (http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/ ) scroll down and find it that way. Lawrence