>Axel Dörfler wrote: > >> Exactly, but despite its professional presentation, >> David's statements are just rants, > >Be that as it may, David is not someone who would just rant >for the sake of it. I actually met him a couple of months >ago here in Cape Town (you may not know that he's a >professional airline pilot), and I didn't get the impression >he'd leave something that in many ways is dear to him if >there was no substance to it. > >Actually, I find it quite amazing what reaction (on this >list) his statement drew. I would have expected a little >more introspection and soul-searching, but instead (at least >it appears to me as) it's just put aside as a rant in which >certain individuals don't see much truth, and that (even if >it's just me) I think is dangerous, especially in the light >of people like Frans van Nispen and Ithamar Adema leaving >the team. > >Remember.... there aren't all that many people interested in >BeOS/OBOS, and having highly skilled folks like the three >mentioned leave is indeed a heavy loss. > >> (and, of course we can improve things, but that's mostly >> like all things could be improved - and doesn't have much >> to do with what David wrote) > >If they can be improved, why aren't they improved then? > >I also understand that not all ideas put forward are >feasible, but sometimes I think there is too little vision >present here and too much short-sightedness and >egocentricity. And that doesn't do anyone good, least of all >the project as whole. > >Just my 0.02, > >Helmar > > > > > >