[haiku] Re: Haiku package freedom.
- From: Chris Andrew <cjhandrew@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:16:49 +0000
Apologies for top-posting.
ATM, I'm neither a user nor helper, but am willing to be both. As
stated earlier (I think), sometimes the licence information is missing
('Public domain'), this needs to be cleared-up and it could so easily
become FSF compliant at the 'stroke of a pen'. If software freedom is
not of interest, then I'm sure M$ will be offering money soon to make
sure the Haiku project don't create any competition ;-).
Chris.
2009/10/29 scott mc <scottmc2@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Ok, thanks for that :-). Scott, any thoughts?
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>
> Chris,
>
> Welcome to the list. First off, please don't top post. Second, when
> replying, be sure to remove any previous email addresses, and only
> quote the needed parts of the previous emails.
>
> Are you a future Haiku user or will you be looking to help do some of
> the work? We could use a few more hands at HaikuPorts if you are
> interested. Read through the site first and see what you think. As
> for your questions, yes it could be added to the file, but why? What
> do we get out of it? We already include the license, so whether it
> complies with FSF can be derived from that, can't it?
>
> -scott
>
>
--
Reasons why you may want to try GNU/Linux:
http://www.getgnulinux.org/
Other related posts:
