Hi, Am 31.08.2014 um 00:05 schrieb Andrew Lindesay <apl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Stephan; > >>> Last night, I've got the bulk transfers going, and since those tell me > ... >> Done. > > ^^^ That's all really great!! :-) If you get stuck or need clarifications on > the API, just let me know! There is one thing I am wondering about, and it’s to do with package architectures. When invoking the getPkg method, I know the architecture of the package I am asking. When using getBulkPkg, there is only one architecture field for all requested packages. It appears that all the _source packages are not found by the web app, and I am thinking it may be due to the architecture („any“ ?) they provide (and I am asking for „x86_gcc2“). In theory, I could try to do bulk transfers grouped by architecture, but of course that would make the code more complicated. I wonder why the architecture has to be provided at all. Isn’t the web-app connected to a single repository, so the names should be already unique. Even if there are multiple repositories later, package names should never clash and if two repositories have packages of the same name, they should be a single entry in the web app anyway. In the web-app, it’s somewhat similar - why do we have to select the architecture, instead of - for example - filtering by architecture? One could see all architectures mixed in the list by default. I also have some suggestion for working with the web app interface. I think it would be great to see small icons (or letters in the first iteration) in the package list view which indicate what sort of information is already filled out for the package. „C“ for categories, „I“ for icons, „S“ for screenshots, „T“ for translations. For the T, there could be a hover tooltip listing the translation’s language codes. Actually, the same hover tips could be used for the other indicators. This would accomplish two things: Show directly in the list which packages need work, and via the hover tips, it would allow a quick peaking into the information. I am also wondering whether providing some info could be done with less layers. The icon could be set by drag & drop into the browser perhaps, maybe even the screenshots could be added this way. And the categories could also display in a box directly on the package page. That way, one wouldn’t have to click on a command first, at least for some edits. I don’t know how much work this would be to change. The small indicators in the list view are more important in any case. I didn’t have any problems with navigation anymore, and it’s a nice touch that clicking „Home“ still takes you back to the last page you had in the listing. It feels great how everything starts falling into place, and there is still so much opportunity to grow with HaikuDepot… :-D (Sorry it is taking me so long.) Best regards, -Stephan