Am 31.08.2014 13:56, schrieb Andrew Lindesay:
Listing "source" packages is more tricky because there's no proper
notion of "latest". For example, for "x86_gcc2", the latest GCC sources
are 2.x and for "x86" the latest is 4.x. I'd suggest that listing
source packages might not be a good idea -- maybe you (and I) would be
better to check for the presence of a corresponding source package when
somebody views a given actual binary package and indicate that sources
are available on the package detail view. What are your thoughts on
that?
It sounds good to me, but I would like to hear thoughts from Ingo or
Oliver on that.
