[gmpi] Re: 3.14 UIs
- From: "Koen Tanghe" <koen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 17:05:03 +0200
On Sunday, May 30, 2004 1:53 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Jeff McClintock <xxxjeffmcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> For the out of process comms OSC seems like a good candidate.
>
> Yeah, no need to reinvent OSC.
>
> In fact why not retain the OSC syntax for in-process GUIs too. Replace
> TCP with something more direct, like simple function calls into the host.
> That way both remote and local GUIs become essentially the same thing
> (with different 'transport' mechanisms).
> Running a GUI remotely then becomes a case of inserting a TCP wrapper
> between GUI and Host. The plugin dosn't need to know.
This seems like a good idea to me too.
(don't know if there might be technical issues due to longer transport times
when used over TCP though?)
Koen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
