# [geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation

• From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
• To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:53:40 -0800 (PST)

```Paul D.
"Arguments about how many teeth a horse might have is not the way to go. The
way to go is to go and count them."

Arguments about how many rotations a moon might have is not the way to go. The
way to go is to go to a stationary point in the universe, where the moon can be
observed from,
and count them.  Agreed.

Bernie

--- On Mon, 11/24/08, Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, November 24, 2008, 10:59 PM

Bernie B

Well done -- no equivocation!

I've added to the drawing. There is now a rubber band fitted between two hooks
on the bottom of the ball and two hooks on a fixed object mounted below the
centre of the thin, circular metal rod.

I now ask you another question. If the ball is propelled around the circle,
will the rubber band show twisting? Further, will the twisting not be in fact,
one twist for each and every trip the ball makes around the circle?

In another post this thread -- From philip madsen Mon Nov 24 21:36:28 2008, he
has presented you with excellent advice. Study it, understand it. It is the
truth.

In another post this thread -- From Bernie Brauer Mon Nov 24 15:39:38 2008, you
said -

It actually also works against heliocentrists because
who could believe their synchronized Moon rotation explanation?
The odds are way against that type of order in an exploding universe.
As has been mentioned previously by others, it doesn't make a jot of difference
what you believe, or what others believe -- what matters is what is. Arguments
about how many teeth a horse might have is not the way to go. The way to go is
to go and count them. Well metaphorically speaking, so far as the phenomenon of
synchronised orbits of moons is concerned, the teeth have been counted. Most of
the large moons in the solar system have their rotations synchronised with
their revolutions. Even further, there is one planet which has an orbit where
the rotation is synchronised with the revolution though it is not 1:1 but
rather 1.5:1. I'll not spoil your joy of discovery though -- you'll be thrilled
to discover it for yourself.

Paul D

From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, 24 November, 2008 3:19:47 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation

Paul,

Yes, that looks like a fair representation.
"All rigid body movements are rotations, translations, or combinations of the
two."

So the movement of the Moon is a translation, but there
is no rotation. The Moon is fixed within the rotating firmament.

Bernie

--- On Sun, 11/23/08, Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sunday, November 23, 2008, 11:56 PM

Bernie B

You said to Philip -- From Bernie Brauer Sat Nov 22 07:58:12 2008

If you go dwon to your local day-care centre ( where toddlers get dropped off
so mummie can go to work to help daddy pay 66% ALL-TOTAL  taxation ) you will
see a toy where you can slide a wooden sphere along a circular thin metal
rod. So the sphere is fixed upon the circular rod and the same point always
shows inward.
I have attached an illustration of what I think you have described but with the
small addition of a straight, thin, light, paper tube attached to the wooden
ball so as to indicate visually that it always points to the centre. The ball
-- with the indicator -- is shown travelling around the circular rod in a
clock-wise direction.

Is this a fair representation? Please indicate any reservations or arguments
you may have.

Paul D

Start your day with Yahoo!7 and win a Sony Bravia TV. Enter Now.

Start your day with Yahoo!7 and win a Sony Bravia TV. Enter Now

```