# [geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation

• To: "geocentrism list" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:00:28 +1000

```We have knocked this argument on the head by laboratory /kitchen experiment
before. The moon rotates..  As regards the two systems , in geostatic , the
moon would have to rotate 24 revs per day..  In the helio system it rotates
once every "month"..  The 5% poses no problem  , not to me or any ordinary
astronomer.

check the archives..  Allen refuses to accept a simple geometric answer for
which we have to thank Regner when he explained translation with and without
rotation.

If the moon did not rotate at all, ie it kept one face to a single star or any
fixed point, . then as it orbited the earth we would have to see its whole
surface in the course of one orbit.

It would appear to us to be rotating.. this is another example of what you see
is not what you got....and none of it effects the geo position
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernie Brauer
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 10:28 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Moon Rotation

Question: In Geocentrism/Geostatic, does the Moon rotate?
Answer: "Putting a hundred things that factor in aside, the central
fact which both geo and helio models must accommodate is that the same side of
the moon ( plus c. 5% as I recall ) is all we ever see from the Earth.  All
kinds of phenomena could enter into producing that extra 5% ( Harvest and
Hunter Moon variations; the 31,000 mile in and out spiral every two weeks; some
kind of inclination constant; etc. ) so I don’t pretend to have that worked
out. It just seems to me that the answer is basically “no” with some kind of a
partial rotation incorporated in each revolution which would accommodate—or
allow to be seen—the extra 5% movement without continuing to rotate.
Anyway, the same face reality remains and is something that both models
have to accommodate. The helio accommodation is forced to abandon all
observational evidence and embrace three major assumptions in order to
fabricate a mathematical model which must continually lay on a montage of
assumptions for every claim it makes to achieve the stages to the Kabbalic Big
Bang “creation scenario”.
The first two assumptions are that the Earth rotates and that it orbits
the sun ( which must stop its observed orbit around the Earth ). But these
alone simply can not and do not work without the third assumption; namely, that
the Moon’s direction must be reversed from what is observed.  And, of course,
its speed must be adjusted so that it will accommodate what is actually seen.
I don’t think one person—even “educated” persons—in a thousand realizes
that the Copernican Mathematical Model could not work unless the Moon’s
direction is reversed so that it goes the opposite of what is seen.  This is
not science!  Science ( scire ) means “to know”. If we don’t know what we see
and what we see never changes ( east to west ) is the truth, then we can never
know anything and “science” has no meaning. Contrariwise, if we say we know
what we see and has never changed is the truth because a mathematical model can
give us a way of denying what we see, then, clearly, we can never truly know
anything but invented/created mathematical theory and no true “science” can
exist.  This is the Pharisee way with its Kabbalic “wisdom” which uses
witchcraft to make lies into truths with its “relativity” and all the rest.
God will not let His Word come back void, but it will accomplish what
it says . . . namely, SUN, STAND THOU STILL, and all the rest . . . The Bible
and Christ-killing Pharisee Religion’s Big Bang Evolutionary Paradigm is a
supernaturally empowered clever counterfeit of the truth, and heliocentricity
is both its keystone and its Achilles Heel.  Marshall Hall

. . . it is nothing more than a single point that has a progressive

point . . . now look on the Moon . . . take any fixed point on the Moon
. . . the only progressive radial orientation made by any fixed point on the
Moon is to a common point that lay outside the Moon . . . thus the Moon does
not rotate it orbits . . . a rotation is a progressive radial orientaion to a
common point that lay internal of the object in rotation . . . i.e. the center
of a record, drill any hole you want to in it . . . all rotation will be around
that point that lay inside the record itself . . . where in an orbit the only
common point that any other point on the Moon can make a progressive radial
orientation to is at the Earth not the

Moon . . . orbit common point outside the body in question . . .
rotation = common point internal to the body in question . . . the Moon orbits
it most certainly does not rotate.  Allen Daves

```