Re: hi
- From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:55:20 +0200
You'll have to get it when I'm not there. I will inform my parental unit.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> LOL@toilet rolls
>
> Ok cool. Thanks bro :)
>
> So I'll grab everything from your place tomorrow after 6pm?
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Done.
>> I'll have to pack it tonight though, I might be too late to pack tomorrow.
>> 2xHDMI cables
>> 2xPS3 power cables
>> 4xcontrollers
>> 1xscreen (2nd one at Jeeva's)
>> 1xscreen power cable
>> 1xusb to mini-usb synch cable.
>> 1xAV multi-out (just in case you need it)
>>
>> ...and many, many empty toilet rolls...lol
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>> I'd prefer to grab everything before Friday, so if you could pack
>>> everything on Thursday, I'll collect it after work.
>>>
>>> Thanks bro :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @Sap.
>>>> I only get finished at 6.
>>>> I can set you up with the consoles and 1 screen. If you get the other
>>>> one at Jeeva's, that's 2.
>>>> I'll pack the goods for you to collect, just give me a time.
>>>> On 5 Mar 2014 09:23, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> yeah man 5 o clock is too steep. I can try for 6:30.
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:20:09 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: hi
>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> Understandable bro. I could use the console, but then I'd require an
>>>>> additional screen...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I can help out with a console if you need it, but there is no way I
>>>>> can make 5pm on a work day.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>>>> *Sent:* 05 March 2014 9:14 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: hi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This Friday Di.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally heard back from Genshiken:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Hi Ryan,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It should start at 17:00 in Molly Blackburn Hall's foyer.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We believe that around 6-8 consoles would be sufficient. Should you
>>>>> require any more, please let us know, and we can try to rouse up a few
>>>>> more
>>>>> from our committee members."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nic and Lindsey indicated that they'd be able to help out. Anyone else?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> When is the event?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The event will be at held at the UCT sports center. Genshiken wants
>>>>> to run a Tekken tourney and also have some other games running on the
>>>>> side.
>>>>> Clint aka Zombie Dredd will also be there doing his own thing.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm just waiting for feedback on how many consoles will be required
>>>>> and what time the event starts.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Who's interested in attending?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> green hand so spammable now its unbelievable. gg
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTG4lAVl4QU
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 20:33:07 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: hi
>>>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This Friday?
>>>>> My consoles are your consoles bro.
>>>>> Hit me up with details when you get them.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4 Mar 2014 20:03, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> *lol* Gettin schooled by the prof... classic :P
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Got the following message from Genshiken:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Hi there Ryan,
>>>>>
>>>>> Would you and CTS be interested in helping us host a gaming event on
>>>>> Friday at all, should you be available?"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Waiting for specifics.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Lol, I told him but come on, the guy isn't really going to attend
>>>>> every weekend. Maybe he'll come to a CTS though.
>>>>>
>>>>> He used my hori, I used pad.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Kevin is OP
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4 March 2014 18:18, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> What controller did he use.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:17 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Let him know about the sessions. He sounds legit.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I was seriously shocked. He had feint cancels and everything.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then again, he is asian, so it makes sense.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:07 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That awkward moment when your professor schools you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Was playing AE with Skamanke today.This guy and his backdash
>>>>> button -_-
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, got to my supervisor for another meeting and he saw my hori
>>>>> and was like "wow! You have a joystick?"
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm like "yeah, just for some fun", obviously I wasn't just going to
>>>>> go all into it with my prof. He is like "Fun? You should play Mark of the
>>>>> Wolves or The Last Blade. Those are real games, made by SNK. No Capcom
>>>>> rubbish"
>>>>>
>>>>> We played.
>>>>>
>>>>> The guy has combos... His Kevin is broken -_-
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure
>>>>>
>>>>> But it seems like it roughly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Used to able to run MP7-8
>>>>>
>>>>> Now Torment 2 seems to be the sweet spot me atm.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Game work differently tho so its hard to directly compare.
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:45:28 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is master lvl = mp3 , torment 1 =5?
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:06:47 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>> Arcane Power on Crit
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 15:00:17 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: hi
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> Apoc?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, i think it's fair that blizzard nerfed the whole perma-mindless
>>>>> spam build. It makes the game a bit boring. I like how the new patch
>>>>> introduced so many new different types of builds. At one point everyone is
>>>>> basically the same lolz but now you can have fun a bit.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To bad they fixed the WD more than 10 zombie dog bug. (The bug is
>>>>> that, zombie dogs that didn't spawn from the "Zombie Dog" skill itself
>>>>> doesn't count towards max zombie dogs allowed. So passive and other skills
>>>>> that gives zombie dogs when a monster dies stays...) saw a vid with 10
>>>>> zombie dogs. looks fun :) I think they removed this bug because it cause
>>>>> performance issue...i mean just the 0 CD with 3 zombie dog build is
>>>>> already
>>>>> stifling performance of the game.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Damage and build variety is waaaaay better from the looks of it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Perma builds got nerfed ofcourse like everybody. Perma freeze or
>>>>> Perma Archon etc. and Apoc in general
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:43:47 +0200
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: hi
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> Poor WD lolz
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> didn't they nerf Wiz too?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://eu.battle.net/d3/en/forum/2823159/
>>>>>
>>>>> Problem is that with the new patch there are far too many people
>>>>> posting 'builds' that are just their random choice of skills.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dunno exactly how thing are going but Monk/Wiz > DH/Barb. Don't care
>>>>> how the WD is doing.
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:31 PM
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: hi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> How's monk in 2.0.1? i'm still not feeling the class...maybe i just
>>>>> don't like their playstyle :/ What new builds do they have other than
>>>>> dashing strike, bells, cyclone?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> DH looks very good in 2.0.1 now. Will main DH now :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:28 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Il play monk to get paragon and keys. I want to play somethng
>>>>> difrent nw. Helfire rings r op in 2.0.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:24:37 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Also LB, don't be playing the Barb expecting to be OP or anything. A
>>>>> lot of the casual Barb players are migrating to Monk because he's so much
>>>>> stronger now than the Barb.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:22 PM
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sap is playing wizard. I had to resort to using follower coz i kept
>>>>> dying
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:20:09 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>> Wizard!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Frozen orb is boss
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:14:37 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't worry too much about them because you can always reset them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Go with res-all before +% life.
>>>>> Your movement speed (total, including equip) should be +25%. I get 12%
>>>>> from Inna Pants, 12% from Lacuni and 1% from paragon levels.
>>>>> Go with attack speed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Depending on your build, some other things change - like whether you
>>>>> want splash damage.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Barb has been nerfed massively, especially in comparison to the
>>>>> Monk. Don't expect your Barb to be unkillable anymore. Also don't expect
>>>>> any perma-builds.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:06 PM
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Aah okay i see thanks. I duno where to put my paragon levels,
>>>>> everythng luks gud.
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:00:29 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh wait, are you talking about a WW Barb? I thought you meant the
>>>>> twirly Monk thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Viable WW builds now? Uh, not really there. Well, you can get them,
>>>>> but you need to be properly equipped.
>>>>>
>>>>> Previously you used Battle Rage > Into the Fray so that crit hits
>>>>> generated fury. Then WoTB > Thrive on Chaos allowed you to add time to
>>>>> WoTB
>>>>> for fury generated.
>>>>> As long as you had crit chance of around 40% unbuffed, your passives
>>>>> and skills could push this past 80%. That meant you'd never run out of
>>>>> fury
>>>>> as long as you hit enough people fast enough.
>>>>>
>>>>> HoTA - crit chance higher if you've got full fury - meant that my crit
>>>>> chance was around 95% for HoTA.
>>>>>
>>>>> For WW barb, you added the WW rune that lets you attack at your
>>>>> movement speed. Then you add Sprint with the Tornados. They proc'd enough
>>>>> to generate your non-stop fury. WW dealt the damage to kill. Throw in Rend
>>>>> to make you Immortal and you're good to go.
>>>>>
>>>>> A proper working WW barb would set you back only around 50m.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> TL:DR - these builds no longer work - you can't generate fury from
>>>>> crit hits. L2P
>>>>>
>>>>> Superstition is a great passive now for fury generation. Against
>>>>> elemental elites, you will never run out of fury. You can perma-HoTA them.
>>>>> As long as your fury spent to life is high enough, you can live doing
>>>>> this.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://us.battle.net/d3/en/calculator/barbarian#ahdRSk!hYe!ZcYcZb
>>>>>
>>>>> That's the sort of thing you should go for if you want a WW build
>>>>> these days.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, the Barbarian is not a ballerina. Stop using WW.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, your BB is level 26 or some crap. Come back when you're max
>>>>> level and we'll talk again. There are no builds for low level Barbs. Get
>>>>> level reduced gear and shove gems in there.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 1:44 PM
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ya fkn paye registration. U need to give me info on keeping up that
>>>>> spin dammit.
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:40:07 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>> You physically go to SARS? You do know that you can do your tax
>>>>> online, right? Also your company should send the IRP5s straight to SARS to
>>>>> pre-populate the tax fields. Takes me about 5 minutes to do my tax every
>>>>> year.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 1:38 PM
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is sars so kuk full wtf? Im running outa mana quick when i spin.
>>>>> How did ppl keep up the spin for so long in vanilla d3?
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:12:59 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: hi
>>>>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> > What would you say if Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he
>>>>> is just stupid? Or what if Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration
>>>>> didn't?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're overcomplicating it and looking at it in the wrong way.
>>>>> Remember, Infiltration was just reacting to Sanford Kelly. He was just
>>>>> remembered the situation from before and progressively punished harder
>>>>> after getting hit by it once. There wasn't a big tactical aspect behind
>>>>> it. He just adapted to what Sanford was doing. There's no luck involved
>>>>> either. Given the number of options players have at that range, it's
>>>>> extremely hard to perform a counter on reaction. You have to place that
>>>>> counter higher in your memory bank. Remember how we played once and you
>>>>> hit me with a focus attack, and then afterwards I kept punishing it with
>>>>> an
>>>>> Ultra? Same thing. The difference is that the way Infiltration handled
>>>>> it
>>>>> there was no easy way for him to get baited into punishing incorrectly.
>>>>> cr.mk xx tatsu would work even if Sanford Kelly backdashed, so would
>>>>> cr.hk xx demon.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I suppose "I don't know".
>>>>>
>>>>> Pah, I know it sounds silly but if I changed what I did every time I
>>>>> got hit by something, I'm not respecting the fact the guy probably has
>>>>> something else up his sleeve to "counter my counter".
>>>>>
>>>>> I just use a "penalty shootout" mentality to deal with mixups. If I
>>>>> always go left as goalie, whether you know it or not, eventually you will
>>>>> shoot left, at least once, even if you KNOW shooting right seems to be the
>>>>> best option. Its called probability matching, and its generally inherent
>>>>> in
>>>>> any living organism.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, after the blocked shot, the general option by the shooter will
>>>>> be to switch back to the winning option... but that is when the goalie
>>>>> changes too! This usually shatters the morale of the shooter... or at
>>>>> least
>>>>> gives me a nice comfortable spot "inside his head", although I didn't do a
>>>>> single thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Its the same reason that I prefer to "air to air" a guy then use an
>>>>> anti-air, because that means I 'knew' you were going to jump and that is
>>>>> scary. DP could just be from reaction.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> TL:DR, I try and get you used to be me being silly and then turn
>>>>> smart. It catches you unawares and you lose the match :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Doesn't work on guys who stick to their guns though.
>>>>>
>>>>> So totally is luck, rather than adaption. What would you say if
>>>>> Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is just stupid? Or what if
>>>>> Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration didn't?
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, there are probably arguments for and against what I'm saying,
>>>>> doesn't really matter.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
