Re: hi

  • From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 20:03:44 +0200

*lol* Gettin schooled by the prof... classic :P

Got the following message from Genshiken:

"Hi there Ryan,

Would you and CTS be interested in helping us host a gaming event on Friday at
all, should you be available?"

Waiting for specifics.


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Lol, I told him but come on, the guy isn't really going to attend every
> weekend. Maybe he'll come to a CTS though.
>
> He used my hori, I used pad.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Stephen Scheidel 
> <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Kevin is OP
>>
>>
>> On 4 March 2014 18:18, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> What controller did he use.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:17 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Let him know about the sessions. He sounds legit.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I was seriously shocked. He had feint cancels and everything.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then again, he is asian, so it makes sense.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:07 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> That awkward moment when your professor schools you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Was playing AE with Skamanke today.This guy and his backdash button
>>>>>>> -_-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyway, got to my supervisor for another meeting and he saw my hori
>>>>>>> and was like "wow! You have a joystick?"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm like "yeah, just for some fun", obviously I wasn't just going to
>>>>>>> go all into it with my prof. He is like "Fun? You should play Mark of 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> Wolves or The Last Blade. Those are real games, made by SNK. No Capcom
>>>>>>> rubbish"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We played.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The guy has combos... His Kevin is broken -_-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Wynand-Ben 
>>>>>>> <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not sure
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But it seems like it roughly.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Used to able to run MP7-8
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now Torment 2 seems to be the sweet spot me atm.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Game work differently tho so its hard to directly compare.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:45:28 +0000
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is master lvl = mp3 , torment 1 =5?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:06:47 +0000
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Arcane Power on Crit
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 15:00:17 +0200
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: hi
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Apoc?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, i think it's fair that blizzard nerfed the whole
>>>>>>>> perma-mindless spam build. It makes the game a bit boring. I like how 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> new patch introduced so many new different types of builds. At one 
>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>> everyone is basically the same lolz but now you can have fun a bit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To bad they fixed the WD more than 10 zombie dog bug. (The bug is
>>>>>>>> that, zombie dogs that didn't spawn from the "Zombie Dog" skill itself
>>>>>>>> doesn't count towards max zombie dogs allowed. So passive and other 
>>>>>>>> skills
>>>>>>>> that gives zombie dogs when a monster dies stays...) saw a vid with 10
>>>>>>>> zombie dogs. looks fun :) I think they removed this bug because it 
>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>> performance issue...i mean just the 0 CD with 3 zombie dog build is 
>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>> stifling performance of the game.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Damage and build variety is waaaaay better from the looks of it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Perma builds got nerfed ofcourse like everybody.  Perma freeze or
>>>>>>>> Perma Archon etc. and Apoc in general
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:43:47 +0200
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: hi
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Poor WD lolz
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> didn't they nerf Wiz too?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  http://eu.battle.net/d3/en/forum/2823159/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Problem is that with the new patch there are far too many people
>>>>>>>> posting 'builds' that are just their random choice of skills.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dunno exactly how thing are going but Monk/Wiz > DH/Barb. Don't
>>>>>>>> care how the WD is doing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:31 PM
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  How's monk in 2.0.1? i'm still not feeling the class...maybe i
>>>>>>>> just don't like their playstyle :/ What new builds do they have other 
>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>> dashing strike, bells, cyclone?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  DH looks very good in 2.0.1 now. Will main DH now :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:28 PM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Il play monk to get paragon and keys. I want to play somethng
>>>>>>>> difrent nw. Helfire rings r op in 2.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>>>>>>  Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:24:37 +0000
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Also LB, don't be playing the Barb expecting to be OP or
>>>>>>>> anything. A lot of the casual Barb players are migrating to Monk 
>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>> he's so much stronger now than the Barb.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:22 PM
>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Sap is playing wizard. I had to resort to using follower coz i
>>>>>>>> kept dying
>>>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>  From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:20:09 +0000
>>>>>>>>  Wizard!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Frozen orb is boss
>>>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:14:37 +0000
>>>>>>>>  Don't worry too much about them because you can always reset them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Go with res-all before +% life.
>>>>>>>> Your movement speed (total, including equip) should be +25%. I get
>>>>>>>> 12% from Inna Pants, 12% from Lacuni and 1% from paragon levels.
>>>>>>>> Go with attack speed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Depending on your build, some other things change - like whether
>>>>>>>> you want splash damage.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Barb has been nerfed massively, especially in comparison to the
>>>>>>>> Monk. Don't expect your Barb to be unkillable anymore. Also don't 
>>>>>>>> expect
>>>>>>>> any perma-builds.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:06 PM
>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Aah okay i see thanks.  I duno where to put my paragon levels,
>>>>>>>> everythng luks gud.
>>>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:00:29 +0000
>>>>>>>>  Oh wait, are you talking about a WW Barb? I thought you meant the
>>>>>>>> twirly Monk thing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Viable WW builds now? Uh, not really there. Well, you can get them,
>>>>>>>> but you need to be properly equipped.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Previously you used Battle Rage > Into the Fray so that crit hits
>>>>>>>> generated fury. Then WoTB > Thrive on Chaos allowed you to add time to 
>>>>>>>> WoTB
>>>>>>>> for fury generated.
>>>>>>>> As long as you had crit chance of around 40% unbuffed, your
>>>>>>>> passives and skills could push this past 80%. That meant you'd never 
>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>> out of fury as long as you hit enough people fast enough.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> HoTA - crit chance higher if you've got full fury - meant that my
>>>>>>>> crit chance was around 95% for HoTA.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For WW barb, you added the WW rune that lets you attack at your
>>>>>>>> movement speed. Then you add Sprint with the Tornados. They proc'd 
>>>>>>>> enough
>>>>>>>> to generate your non-stop fury. WW dealt the damage to kill. Throw in 
>>>>>>>> Rend
>>>>>>>> to make you Immortal and you're good to go.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A proper working WW barb would set you back only around 50m.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TL:DR  - these builds no longer work - you can't generate fury from
>>>>>>>> crit hits. L2P
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Superstition is a great passive now for fury generation. Against
>>>>>>>> elemental elites, you will never run out of fury. You can perma-HoTA 
>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>> As long as your fury spent to life is high enough, you can live doing 
>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://us.battle.net/d3/en/calculator/barbarian#ahdRSk!hYe!ZcYcZb
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's the sort of thing you should go for if you want a WW build
>>>>>>>> these days.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, the Barbarian is not a ballerina. Stop using WW.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, your BB is level 26 or some crap. Come back when you're max
>>>>>>>> level and we'll talk again. There are no builds for low level Barbs. 
>>>>>>>> Get
>>>>>>>> level reduced gear and shove gems in there.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 1:44 PM
>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Ya fkn paye registration. U need to give me info on keeping up
>>>>>>>> that spin dammit.
>>>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:40:07 +0000
>>>>>>>>  You physically go to SARS? You do know that you can do your tax
>>>>>>>> online, right? Also your company should send the IRP5s straight to 
>>>>>>>> SARS to
>>>>>>>> pre-populate the tax fields. Takes me about 5 minutes to do my tax 
>>>>>>>> every
>>>>>>>> year.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 1:38 PM
>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Why is sars so kuk full wtf? Im running outa mana quick when i
>>>>>>>> spin. How did ppl keep up the spin for so long in vanilla d3?
>>>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>  Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:12:59 +0200
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: hi
>>>>>>>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>  > What would you say if Infiltration didn't change his tactic?
>>>>>>>> That he is just stupid? Or what if Sanford had changed his tactic and
>>>>>>>> Infiltration didn't?
>>>>>>>>  You're overcomplicating it and looking at it in the wrong way.
>>>>>>>> Remember, Infiltration was just reacting to Sanford Kelly.  He was just
>>>>>>>> remembered the situation from before and progressively punished harder
>>>>>>>> after getting hit by it once.  There wasn't a big tactical aspect 
>>>>>>>> behind
>>>>>>>> it.  He just adapted to what Sanford was doing.  There's no luck 
>>>>>>>> involved
>>>>>>>> either.  Given the number of options players have at that range, it's
>>>>>>>> extremely hard to perform a counter on reaction.  You have to place 
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> counter higher in your memory bank.  Remember how we played once and 
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> hit me with a focus attack, and then afterwards I kept punishing it 
>>>>>>>> with an
>>>>>>>> Ultra?  Same thing.  The difference is that the way Infiltration 
>>>>>>>> handled it
>>>>>>>> there was no easy way for him to get baited into punishing incorrectly.
>>>>>>>> cr.mk xx tatsu would work even if Sanford Kelly backdashed, so
>>>>>>>> would cr.hk xx demon.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  I suppose "I don't know".
>>>>>>>>  Pah, I know it sounds silly but if I changed what I did every
>>>>>>>> time I got hit by something, I'm not respecting the fact the guy 
>>>>>>>> probably
>>>>>>>> has something else up his sleeve to "counter my counter".
>>>>>>>>  I just use a "penalty shootout" mentality to deal with mixups. If
>>>>>>>> I always go left as goalie, whether you know it or not, eventually you 
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> shoot left, at least once, even if you KNOW shooting right seems to be 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> best option. Its called probability matching, and its generally 
>>>>>>>> inherent in
>>>>>>>> any living organism.
>>>>>>>>  Anyway, after the blocked shot, the general option by the shooter
>>>>>>>> will be to switch back to the winning option... but that is when the 
>>>>>>>> goalie
>>>>>>>> changes too! This usually shatters the morale of the shooter... or at 
>>>>>>>> least
>>>>>>>> gives me a nice comfortable spot "inside his head", although I didn't 
>>>>>>>> do a
>>>>>>>> single thing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Its the same reason that I prefer to "air to air" a guy then use an
>>>>>>>> anti-air, because that means I 'knew' you were going to jump and that 
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> scary. DP could just be from reaction.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TL:DR, I try and get you used to be me being silly and then turn
>>>>>>>> smart. It catches you unawares and you lose the match :-)
>>>>>>>>  Doesn't work on guys who stick to their guns though.
>>>>>>>>  So totally is luck, rather than adaption. What would you say if
>>>>>>>> Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is just stupid? Or what 
>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>> Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration didn't?
>>>>>>>>  Anyway, there are probably arguments for and against what I'm
>>>>>>>> saying, doesn't really matter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this 
>>>>>>>> communication in
>>>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," 
>>>>>>>> send to
>>>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of 
>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the 
>>>>>>>> governing
>>>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>> ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm 
>>>>>>>> providing
>>>>>>>> services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") 
>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>> Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>>>>>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
>>>>>>>> provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
>>>>>>>> International is
>>>>>>>> a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as 
>>>>>>>> such.
>>>>>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG 
>>>>>>>> member
>>>>>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>   ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this 
>>>>>>>> communication in
>>>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," 
>>>>>>>> send to
>>>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of 
>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the 
>>>>>>>> governing
>>>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>> ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm 
>>>>>>>> providing
>>>>>>>> services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") 
>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>> Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>>>>>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
>>>>>>>> provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
>>>>>>>> International is
>>>>>>>> a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as 
>>>>>>>> such.
>>>>>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG 
>>>>>>>> member
>>>>>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>   ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this 
>>>>>>>> communication in
>>>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," 
>>>>>>>> send to
>>>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of 
>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the 
>>>>>>>> governing
>>>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>> ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm 
>>>>>>>> providing
>>>>>>>> services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") 
>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>> Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>>>>>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
>>>>>>>> provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
>>>>>>>> International is
>>>>>>>> a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as 
>>>>>>>> such.
>>>>>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG 
>>>>>>>> member
>>>>>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>    ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this 
>>>>>>>> communication in
>>>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," 
>>>>>>>> send to
>>>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of 
>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the 
>>>>>>>> governing
>>>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>> ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm 
>>>>>>>> providing
>>>>>>>> services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") 
>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>> Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>>>>>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
>>>>>>>> provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
>>>>>>>> International is
>>>>>>>> a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as 
>>>>>>>> such.
>>>>>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG 
>>>>>>>> member
>>>>>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this 
>>>>>>>> communication in
>>>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," 
>>>>>>>> send to
>>>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of 
>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the 
>>>>>>>> governing
>>>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>> ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm 
>>>>>>>> providing
>>>>>>>> services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") 
>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>> Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>>>>>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
>>>>>>>> provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
>>>>>>>> International is
>>>>>>>> a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as 
>>>>>>>> such.
>>>>>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG 
>>>>>>>> member
>>>>>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
  • Follow-Ups:
    • RE: hi
      • From: lindsey kiviets
    • Re: hi
      • From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir

Other related posts: