RE: hi
- From: lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:44:23 +0000
Ya fkn paye registration. U need to give me info on keeping up that spin dammit.
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: hi
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:40:07 +0000
You physically go to SARS? You do know that you can do your tax online, right?
Also your company should send the IRP5s straight to
SARS to pre-populate the tax fields. Takes me about 5 minutes to do my tax
every year.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
Sent: 04 March 2014 1:38 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: hi
Why is sars so kuk full wtf? Im running outa mana quick when i spin. How did
ppl keep up the spin for so long in vanilla d3?
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:12:59 +0200
Subject: Re: hi
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> What would you say if Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is just
> stupid? Or what if Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration didn't?
You're overcomplicating it and looking at it in the wrong way. Remember,
Infiltration was just reacting to Sanford Kelly. He was just remembered the
situation
from before and progressively punished harder after getting hit by it once.
There wasn't a big tactical aspect behind it. He just adapted to what Sanford
was doing. There's no luck involved either. Given the number of options
players have at that range,
it's extremely hard to perform a counter on reaction. You have to place that
counter higher in your memory bank. Remember how we played once and you hit me
with a focus attack, and then afterwards I kept punishing it with an Ultra?
Same thing. The difference
is that the way Infiltration handled it there was no easy way for him to get
baited into punishing incorrectly.
cr.mk xx tatsu would work even if Sanford Kelly backdashed, so would
cr.hk xx demon.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I suppose "I don't know".
Pah, I know it sounds silly but if I changed what I did every time I got hit by
something, I'm not respecting the fact the guy probably has something else up
his sleeve to "counter my counter".
I just use a "penalty shootout" mentality to deal with mixups. If I always go
left as goalie, whether you know it or not, eventually you will shoot left, at
least
once, even if you KNOW shooting right seems to be the best option. Its called
probability matching, and its generally inherent in any living organism.
Anyway, after the blocked shot, the general option by the shooter will be to
switch back to the winning option... but that is when the goalie changes too!
This usually shatters the morale
of the shooter... or at least gives me a nice comfortable spot "inside his
head", although I didn't do a single thing.
Its the same reason that I prefer to "air to air" a guy then use an anti-air,
because that means I 'knew' you were going to jump and that is scary. DP could
just be from reaction.
TL:DR, I try and get you used to be me being silly and then turn smart. It
catches you unawares and you lose the match :-)
Doesn't work on guys who stick to their guns though.
So totally is luck, rather than adaption. What would you say if Infiltration
didn't change his tactic? That he is just stupid? Or what if Sanford had changed
his tactic and Infiltration didn't?
Anyway, there are probably arguments for and against what I'm saying, doesn't
really matter.
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: hi
- From: Donaldson, Alasdair
Other related posts:
