RE: hi

  • From: lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:22:28 +0000

Sap is playing wizard. I had to resort to using follower coz i kept dying

From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: hi
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:20:09 +0000




Wizard!


Frozen orb is boss

From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: hi
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:14:37 +0000









Don’t worry too much about them because you can always reset them.
 
Go with res-all before +% life.
Your movement speed (total, including equip) should be +25%. I get 12% from 
Inna Pants, 12% from Lacuni and 1% from paragon levels.
Go with attack speed.
 
Depending on your build, some other things change – like whether you want 
splash damage.
 
The Barb has been nerfed massively, especially in comparison to the Monk. Don’t 
expect your Barb to be unkillable anymore. Also don’t
 expect any perma-builds.
 


From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets

Sent: 04 March 2014 2:06 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: hi


 

Aah okay i see thanks.  I duno where to put my paragon levels, everythng luks 
gud.




From:
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: hi

Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:00:29 +0000

Oh wait, are you talking about a WW Barb? I thought you meant the twirly Monk 
thing.
 
Viable WW builds now? Uh, not really there. Well, you can get them, but you 
need to be properly equipped.
 
Previously you used Battle Rage > Into the Fray so that crit hits generated 
fury. Then WoTB > Thrive on Chaos allowed you to add time to WoTB for fury 
generated.
As long as you had crit chance of around 40% unbuffed, your passives and skills 
could push this past 80%. That meant you’d never run out of fury as long as
 you hit enough people fast enough.
 
HoTA – crit chance higher if you’ve got full fury – meant that my crit chance 
was around 95% for HoTA.
 
For WW barb, you added the WW rune that lets you attack at your movement speed. 
Then you add Sprint with the Tornados. They proc’d enough to generate your 
non-stop
 fury. WW dealt the damage to kill. Throw in Rend to make you Immortal and 
you’re good to go.
 
A proper working WW barb would set you back only around 50m.
 
 
TL:DR  - these builds no longer work – you can’t generate fury from crit hits. 
L2P
 
Superstition is a great passive now for fury generation. Against elemental 
elites, you will never run out of fury. You can perma-HoTA them. As long as your
 fury spent to life is high enough, you can live doing this.
 
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/calculator/barbarian#ahdRSk!hYe!ZcYcZb
 
That’s the sort of thing you should go for if you want a WW build these days.
 
Also, the Barbarian is not a ballerina. Stop using WW.
 
Also, your BB is level 26 or some crap. Come back when you’re max level and 
we’ll talk again. There are no builds for low level Barbs. Get level reduced 
gear
 and shove gems in there.
 


From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets

Sent: 04 March 2014 1:44 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: hi


 

Ya fkn paye registration. U need to give me info on keeping up that spin dammit.



From: 
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: hi

Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:40:07 +0000

You physically go to SARS? You do know that you can do your tax online, right? 
Also your company should send the IRP5s straight to SARS to pre-populate the
 tax fields. Takes me about 5 minutes to do my tax every year.
 


From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets

Sent: 04 March 2014 1:38 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: hi


 

Why is sars so kuk full wtf? Im running outa mana quick when i spin. How did 
ppl keep up the spin for so long in vanilla d3?



Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:12:59 +0200

Subject: Re: hi

From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


> What would you say if Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is just 
> stupid? Or what if Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration didn't?

You're overcomplicating it and looking at it in the wrong way.  Remember, 
Infiltration was just reacting to Sanford Kelly.  He was just remembered the 
situation from before and progressively
 punished harder after getting hit by it once.  There wasn't a big tactical 
aspect behind it.  He just adapted to what Sanford was doing.  There's no luck 
involved either.  Given the number of options players have at that range, it's 
extremely hard to perform
 a counter on reaction.  You have to place that counter higher in your memory 
bank.  Remember how we played once and you hit me with a focus attack, and then 
afterwards I kept punishing it with an Ultra?  Same thing.  The difference is 
that the way Infiltration
 handled it there was no easy way for him to get baited into punishing 
incorrectly. 
cr.mk xx tatsu would work even if Sanford Kelly backdashed, so would
cr.hk xx demon.


 

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
 wrote:



I suppose "I don't know".



Pah, I know it sounds silly but if I changed what I did every time I got hit by 
something, I'm not respecting the fact the guy probably has something else up 
his sleeve to "counter my counter".



I just use a "penalty shootout" mentality to deal with mixups. If I always go 
left as goalie, whether you know it or not, eventually you will shoot left, at 
least once, even if you KNOW shooting
 right seems to be the best option. Its called probability matching, and its 
generally inherent in any living organism.



Anyway, after the blocked shot, the general option by the shooter will be to 
switch back to the winning option... but that is when the goalie changes too! 
This usually shatters the morale
 of the shooter... or at least gives me a nice comfortable spot "inside his 
head", although I didn't do a single thing.




Its the same reason that I prefer to "air to air" a guy then use an anti-air, 
because that means I 'knew' you were going to jump and that is scary. DP could 
just be from reaction.




TL:DR, I try and get you used to be me being silly and then turn smart. It 
catches you unawares and you lose the match :-)


Doesn't work on guys who stick to their guns though.


So totally is luck, rather than adaption. What would you say if Infiltration 
didn't change his tactic? That he is just stupid? Or what if Sanford had 
changed his tactic and Infiltration didn't?


Anyway, there are probably arguments for and against what I'm saying, doesn't 
really matter.



 




 






The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received
 this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received 
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any
 action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may 
be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the 
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. 
Opinions, conclusions
 and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to 
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.




This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.





The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received
 this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received 
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any
 action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may 
be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the 
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. 
Opinions, conclusions
 and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to 
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.




This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.



The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please 
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original 
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the 
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken 
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do 
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed 
by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. 



This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms 
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to 
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and 
separate entity and each describes itself as such.  Information about the 
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.
                                          
                                          
  • Follow-Ups:
  • References:

Other related posts: