Re: hi
- From: sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 18:17:45 +0200
Let him know about the sessions. He sounds legit.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was seriously shocked. He had feint cancels and everything.
>
> Then again, he is asian, so it makes sense.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:07 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> That awkward moment when your professor schools you.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Was playing AE with Skamanke today.This guy and his backdash button -_-
>>>
>>> Anyway, got to my supervisor for another meeting and he saw my hori and
>>> was like "wow! You have a joystick?"
>>>
>>> I'm like "yeah, just for some fun", obviously I wasn't just going to go
>>> all into it with my prof. He is like "Fun? You should play Mark of the
>>> Wolves or The Last Blade. Those are real games, made by SNK. No Capcom
>>> rubbish"
>>>
>>> We played.
>>>
>>> The guy has combos... His Kevin is broken -_-
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not sure
>>>>
>>>> But it seems like it roughly.
>>>>
>>>> Used to able to run MP7-8
>>>>
>>>> Now Torment 2 seems to be the sweet spot me atm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Game work differently tho so its hard to directly compare.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:45:28 +0000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is master lvl = mp3 , torment 1 =5?
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:06:47 +0000
>>>>
>>>> Arcane Power on Crit
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 15:00:17 +0200
>>>> Subject: Re: hi
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> Apoc?
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, i think it's fair that blizzard nerfed the whole perma-mindless
>>>> spam build. It makes the game a bit boring. I like how the new patch
>>>> introduced so many new different types of builds. At one point everyone is
>>>> basically the same lolz but now you can have fun a bit.
>>>>
>>>> To bad they fixed the WD more than 10 zombie dog bug. (The bug is that,
>>>> zombie dogs that didn't spawn from the "Zombie Dog" skill itself doesn't
>>>> count towards max zombie dogs allowed. So passive and other skills that
>>>> gives zombie dogs when a monster dies stays...) saw a vid with 10 zombie
>>>> dogs. looks fun :) I think they removed this bug because it cause
>>>> performance issue...i mean just the 0 CD with 3 zombie dog build is already
>>>> stifling performance of the game.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Damage and build variety is waaaaay better from the looks of it.
>>>>
>>>> Perma builds got nerfed ofcourse like everybody. Perma freeze or Perma
>>>> Archon etc. and Apoc in general
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:43:47 +0200
>>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: hi
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> Poor WD lolz
>>>>
>>>> didn't they nerf Wiz too?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> http://eu.battle.net/d3/en/forum/2823159/
>>>>
>>>> Problem is that with the new patch there are far too many people
>>>> posting 'builds' that are just their random choice of skills.
>>>>
>>>> Dunno exactly how thing are going but Monk/Wiz > DH/Barb. Don't care
>>>> how the WD is doing.
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:31 PM
>>>>
>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> *Subject:* Re: hi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How's monk in 2.0.1? i'm still not feeling the class...maybe i just
>>>> don't like their playstyle :/ What new builds do they have other than
>>>> dashing strike, bells, cyclone?
>>>>
>>>> DH looks very good in 2.0.1 now. Will main DH now :)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:28 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Il play monk to get paragon and keys. I want to play somethng difrent
>>>> nw. Helfire rings r op in 2.0.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:24:37 +0000
>>>>
>>>> Also LB, don't be playing the Barb expecting to be OP or anything. A
>>>> lot of the casual Barb players are migrating to Monk because he's so much
>>>> stronger now than the Barb.
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:22 PM
>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>>
>>>> Sap is playing wizard. I had to resort to using follower coz i kept
>>>> dying
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:20:09 +0000
>>>> Wizard!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Frozen orb is boss
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:14:37 +0000
>>>> Don't worry too much about them because you can always reset them.
>>>>
>>>> Go with res-all before +% life.
>>>> Your movement speed (total, including equip) should be +25%. I get 12%
>>>> from Inna Pants, 12% from Lacuni and 1% from paragon levels.
>>>> Go with attack speed.
>>>>
>>>> Depending on your build, some other things change - like whether you
>>>> want splash damage.
>>>>
>>>> The Barb has been nerfed massively, especially in comparison to the
>>>> Monk. Don't expect your Barb to be unkillable anymore. Also don't expect
>>>> any perma-builds.
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:06 PM
>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>>
>>>> Aah okay i see thanks. I duno where to put my paragon levels,
>>>> everythng luks gud.
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:00:29 +0000
>>>> Oh wait, are you talking about a WW Barb? I thought you meant the
>>>> twirly Monk thing.
>>>>
>>>> Viable WW builds now? Uh, not really there. Well, you can get them, but
>>>> you need to be properly equipped.
>>>>
>>>> Previously you used Battle Rage > Into the Fray so that crit hits
>>>> generated fury. Then WoTB > Thrive on Chaos allowed you to add time to WoTB
>>>> for fury generated.
>>>> As long as you had crit chance of around 40% unbuffed, your passives
>>>> and skills could push this past 80%. That meant you'd never run out of fury
>>>> as long as you hit enough people fast enough.
>>>>
>>>> HoTA - crit chance higher if you've got full fury - meant that my crit
>>>> chance was around 95% for HoTA.
>>>>
>>>> For WW barb, you added the WW rune that lets you attack at your
>>>> movement speed. Then you add Sprint with the Tornados. They proc'd enough
>>>> to generate your non-stop fury. WW dealt the damage to kill. Throw in Rend
>>>> to make you Immortal and you're good to go.
>>>>
>>>> A proper working WW barb would set you back only around 50m.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> TL:DR - these builds no longer work - you can't generate fury from
>>>> crit hits. L2P
>>>>
>>>> Superstition is a great passive now for fury generation. Against
>>>> elemental elites, you will never run out of fury. You can perma-HoTA them.
>>>> As long as your fury spent to life is high enough, you can live doing this.
>>>>
>>>> http://us.battle.net/d3/en/calculator/barbarian#ahdRSk!hYe!ZcYcZb
>>>>
>>>> That's the sort of thing you should go for if you want a WW build these
>>>> days.
>>>>
>>>> Also, the Barbarian is not a ballerina. Stop using WW.
>>>>
>>>> Also, your BB is level 26 or some crap. Come back when you're max level
>>>> and we'll talk again. There are no builds for low level Barbs. Get level
>>>> reduced gear and shove gems in there.
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 1:44 PM
>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>>
>>>> Ya fkn paye registration. U need to give me info on keeping up that
>>>> spin dammit.
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:40:07 +0000
>>>> You physically go to SARS? You do know that you can do your tax
>>>> online, right? Also your company should send the IRP5s straight to SARS to
>>>> pre-populate the tax fields. Takes me about 5 minutes to do my tax every
>>>> year.
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 1:38 PM
>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>>
>>>> Why is sars so kuk full wtf? Im running outa mana quick when i spin.
>>>> How did ppl keep up the spin for so long in vanilla d3?
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:12:59 +0200
>>>> Subject: Re: hi
>>>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> > What would you say if Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That
>>>> he is just stupid? Or what if Sanford had changed his tactic and
>>>> Infiltration didn't?
>>>> You're overcomplicating it and looking at it in the wrong way.
>>>> Remember, Infiltration was just reacting to Sanford Kelly. He was just
>>>> remembered the situation from before and progressively punished harder
>>>> after getting hit by it once. There wasn't a big tactical aspect behind
>>>> it. He just adapted to what Sanford was doing. There's no luck involved
>>>> either. Given the number of options players have at that range, it's
>>>> extremely hard to perform a counter on reaction. You have to place that
>>>> counter higher in your memory bank. Remember how we played once and you
>>>> hit me with a focus attack, and then afterwards I kept punishing it with an
>>>> Ultra? Same thing. The difference is that the way Infiltration handled it
>>>> there was no easy way for him to get baited into punishing incorrectly.
>>>> cr.mk xx tatsu would work even if Sanford Kelly backdashed, so would
>>>> cr.hk xx demon.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I suppose "I don't know".
>>>> Pah, I know it sounds silly but if I changed what I did every time I
>>>> got hit by something, I'm not respecting the fact the guy probably has
>>>> something else up his sleeve to "counter my counter".
>>>> I just use a "penalty shootout" mentality to deal with mixups. If I
>>>> always go left as goalie, whether you know it or not, eventually you will
>>>> shoot left, at least once, even if you KNOW shooting right seems to be the
>>>> best option. Its called probability matching, and its generally inherent in
>>>> any living organism.
>>>> Anyway, after the blocked shot, the general option by the shooter
>>>> will be to switch back to the winning option... but that is when the goalie
>>>> changes too! This usually shatters the morale of the shooter... or at least
>>>> gives me a nice comfortable spot "inside his head", although I didn't do a
>>>> single thing.
>>>>
>>>> Its the same reason that I prefer to "air to air" a guy then use an
>>>> anti-air, because that means I 'knew' you were going to jump and that is
>>>> scary. DP could just be from reaction.
>>>>
>>>> TL:DR, I try and get you used to be me being silly and then turn smart.
>>>> It catches you unawares and you lose the match :-)
>>>> Doesn't work on guys who stick to their guns though.
>>>> So totally is luck, rather than adaption. What would you say if
>>>> Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is just stupid? Or what if
>>>> Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration didn't?
>>>> Anyway, there are probably arguments for and against what I'm saying,
>>>> doesn't really matter.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
