Re: hi
- From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:12:59 +0200
> What would you say if Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is
just stupid? Or what if Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration
didn't?
You're overcomplicating it and looking at it in the wrong way. Remember,
Infiltration was just reacting to Sanford Kelly. He was just remembered
the situation from before and progressively punished harder after getting
hit by it once. There wasn't a big tactical aspect behind it. He just
adapted to what Sanford was doing. There's no luck involved either. Given
the number of options players have at that range, it's extremely hard to
perform a counter on reaction. You have to place that counter higher in
your memory bank. Remember how we played once and you hit me with a focus
attack, and then afterwards I kept punishing it with an Ultra? Same
thing. The difference is that the way Infiltration handled it there was no
easy way for him to get baited into punishing incorrectly. cr.mk xx tatsu
would work even if Sanford Kelly backdashed, so would cr.hk xx demon.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I suppose "I don't know".
>
> Pah, I know it sounds silly but if I changed what I did every time I got
> hit by something, I'm not respecting the fact the guy probably has
> something else up his sleeve to "counter my counter".
>
> I just use a "penalty shootout" mentality to deal with mixups. If I always
> go left as goalie, whether you know it or not, eventually you will shoot
> left, at least once, even if you KNOW shooting right seems to be the best
> option. Its called probability matching, and its generally inherent in any
> living organism.
>
> Anyway, after the blocked shot, the general option by the shooter will be
> to switch back to the winning option... but that is when the goalie changes
> too! This usually shatters the morale of the shooter... or at least gives
> me a nice comfortable spot "inside his head", although I didn't do a single
> thing.
>
> Its the same reason that I prefer to "air to air" a guy then use an
> anti-air, because that means I 'knew' you were going to jump and that is
> scary. DP could just be from reaction.
>
> TL:DR, I try and get you used to be me being silly and then turn smart. It
> catches you unawares and you lose the match :-)
>
> Doesn't work on guys who stick to their guns though.
>
> So totally is luck, rather than adaption. What would you say if
> Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is just stupid? Or what if
> Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration didn't?
>
> Anyway, there are probably arguments for and against what I'm saying,
> doesn't really matter.
>
>
Other related posts:
