Re: hi
- From: Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 18:15:45 +0200
I was seriously shocked. He had feint cancels and everything.
Then again, he is asian, so it makes sense.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:07 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That awkward moment when your professor schools you.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Was playing AE with Skamanke today.This guy and his backdash button -_-
>>
>> Anyway, got to my supervisor for another meeting and he saw my hori and
>> was like "wow! You have a joystick?"
>>
>> I'm like "yeah, just for some fun", obviously I wasn't just going to go
>> all into it with my prof. He is like "Fun? You should play Mark of the
>> Wolves or The Last Blade. Those are real games, made by SNK. No Capcom
>> rubbish"
>>
>> We played.
>>
>> The guy has combos... His Kevin is broken -_-
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure
>>>
>>> But it seems like it roughly.
>>>
>>> Used to able to run MP7-8
>>>
>>> Now Torment 2 seems to be the sweet spot me atm.
>>>
>>>
>>> Game work differently tho so its hard to directly compare.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:45:28 +0000
>>>
>>>
>>> Is master lvl = mp3 , torment 1 =5?
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:06:47 +0000
>>>
>>> Arcane Power on Crit
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 15:00:17 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: hi
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Apoc?
>>>
>>> Yeah, i think it's fair that blizzard nerfed the whole perma-mindless
>>> spam build. It makes the game a bit boring. I like how the new patch
>>> introduced so many new different types of builds. At one point everyone is
>>> basically the same lolz but now you can have fun a bit.
>>>
>>> To bad they fixed the WD more than 10 zombie dog bug. (The bug is that,
>>> zombie dogs that didn't spawn from the "Zombie Dog" skill itself doesn't
>>> count towards max zombie dogs allowed. So passive and other skills that
>>> gives zombie dogs when a monster dies stays...) saw a vid with 10 zombie
>>> dogs. looks fun :) I think they removed this bug because it cause
>>> performance issue...i mean just the 0 CD with 3 zombie dog build is already
>>> stifling performance of the game.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>
>>> Damage and build variety is waaaaay better from the looks of it.
>>>
>>> Perma builds got nerfed ofcourse like everybody. Perma freeze or Perma
>>> Archon etc. and Apoc in general
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:43:47 +0200
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: hi
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Poor WD lolz
>>>
>>> didn't they nerf Wiz too?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> http://eu.battle.net/d3/en/forum/2823159/
>>>
>>> Problem is that with the new patch there are far too many people posting
>>> 'builds' that are just their random choice of skills.
>>>
>>> Dunno exactly how thing are going but Monk/Wiz > DH/Barb. Don't care how
>>> the WD is doing.
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:31 PM
>>>
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: hi
>>>
>>>
>>> How's monk in 2.0.1? i'm still not feeling the class...maybe i just
>>> don't like their playstyle :/ What new builds do they have other than
>>> dashing strike, bells, cyclone?
>>>
>>> DH looks very good in 2.0.1 now. Will main DH now :)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:28 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Il play monk to get paragon and keys. I want to play somethng difrent
>>> nw. Helfire rings r op in 2.0.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:24:37 +0000
>>>
>>> Also LB, don't be playing the Barb expecting to be OP or anything. A
>>> lot of the casual Barb players are migrating to Monk because he's so much
>>> stronger now than the Barb.
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:22 PM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>
>>> Sap is playing wizard. I had to resort to using follower coz i kept
>>> dying
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:20:09 +0000
>>> Wizard!
>>>
>>>
>>> Frozen orb is boss
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:14:37 +0000
>>> Don't worry too much about them because you can always reset them.
>>>
>>> Go with res-all before +% life.
>>> Your movement speed (total, including equip) should be +25%. I get 12%
>>> from Inna Pants, 12% from Lacuni and 1% from paragon levels.
>>> Go with attack speed.
>>>
>>> Depending on your build, some other things change - like whether you
>>> want splash damage.
>>>
>>> The Barb has been nerfed massively, especially in comparison to the
>>> Monk. Don't expect your Barb to be unkillable anymore. Also don't expect
>>> any perma-builds.
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:06 PM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>
>>> Aah okay i see thanks. I duno where to put my paragon levels,
>>> everythng luks gud.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:00:29 +0000
>>> Oh wait, are you talking about a WW Barb? I thought you meant the
>>> twirly Monk thing.
>>>
>>> Viable WW builds now? Uh, not really there. Well, you can get them, but
>>> you need to be properly equipped.
>>>
>>> Previously you used Battle Rage > Into the Fray so that crit hits
>>> generated fury. Then WoTB > Thrive on Chaos allowed you to add time to WoTB
>>> for fury generated.
>>> As long as you had crit chance of around 40% unbuffed, your passives and
>>> skills could push this past 80%. That meant you'd never run out of fury as
>>> long as you hit enough people fast enough.
>>>
>>> HoTA - crit chance higher if you've got full fury - meant that my crit
>>> chance was around 95% for HoTA.
>>>
>>> For WW barb, you added the WW rune that lets you attack at your movement
>>> speed. Then you add Sprint with the Tornados. They proc'd enough to
>>> generate your non-stop fury. WW dealt the damage to kill. Throw in Rend to
>>> make you Immortal and you're good to go.
>>>
>>> A proper working WW barb would set you back only around 50m.
>>>
>>>
>>> TL:DR - these builds no longer work - you can't generate fury from crit
>>> hits. L2P
>>>
>>> Superstition is a great passive now for fury generation. Against
>>> elemental elites, you will never run out of fury. You can perma-HoTA them.
>>> As long as your fury spent to life is high enough, you can live doing this.
>>>
>>> http://us.battle.net/d3/en/calculator/barbarian#ahdRSk!hYe!ZcYcZb
>>>
>>> That's the sort of thing you should go for if you want a WW build these
>>> days.
>>>
>>> Also, the Barbarian is not a ballerina. Stop using WW.
>>>
>>> Also, your BB is level 26 or some crap. Come back when you're max level
>>> and we'll talk again. There are no builds for low level Barbs. Get level
>>> reduced gear and shove gems in there.
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 1:44 PM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>
>>> Ya fkn paye registration. U need to give me info on keeping up that
>>> spin dammit.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: hi
>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:40:07 +0000
>>> You physically go to SARS? You do know that you can do your tax
>>> online, right? Also your company should send the IRP5s straight to SARS to
>>> pre-populate the tax fields. Takes me about 5 minutes to do my tax every
>>> year.
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 1:38 PM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>>
>>> Why is sars so kuk full wtf? Im running outa mana quick when i spin.
>>> How did ppl keep up the spin for so long in vanilla d3?
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:12:59 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: hi
>>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > What would you say if Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he
>>> is just stupid? Or what if Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration
>>> didn't?
>>> You're overcomplicating it and looking at it in the wrong way.
>>> Remember, Infiltration was just reacting to Sanford Kelly. He was just
>>> remembered the situation from before and progressively punished harder
>>> after getting hit by it once. There wasn't a big tactical aspect behind
>>> it. He just adapted to what Sanford was doing. There's no luck involved
>>> either. Given the number of options players have at that range, it's
>>> extremely hard to perform a counter on reaction. You have to place that
>>> counter higher in your memory bank. Remember how we played once and you
>>> hit me with a focus attack, and then afterwards I kept punishing it with an
>>> Ultra? Same thing. The difference is that the way Infiltration handled it
>>> there was no easy way for him to get baited into punishing incorrectly.
>>> cr.mk xx tatsu would work even if Sanford Kelly backdashed, so would
>>> cr.hk xx demon.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> I suppose "I don't know".
>>> Pah, I know it sounds silly but if I changed what I did every time I
>>> got hit by something, I'm not respecting the fact the guy probably has
>>> something else up his sleeve to "counter my counter".
>>> I just use a "penalty shootout" mentality to deal with mixups. If I
>>> always go left as goalie, whether you know it or not, eventually you will
>>> shoot left, at least once, even if you KNOW shooting right seems to be the
>>> best option. Its called probability matching, and its generally inherent in
>>> any living organism.
>>> Anyway, after the blocked shot, the general option by the shooter will
>>> be to switch back to the winning option... but that is when the goalie
>>> changes too! This usually shatters the morale of the shooter... or at least
>>> gives me a nice comfortable spot "inside his head", although I didn't do a
>>> single thing.
>>>
>>> Its the same reason that I prefer to "air to air" a guy then use an
>>> anti-air, because that means I 'knew' you were going to jump and that is
>>> scary. DP could just be from reaction.
>>>
>>> TL:DR, I try and get you used to be me being silly and then turn smart.
>>> It catches you unawares and you lose the match :-)
>>> Doesn't work on guys who stick to their guns though.
>>> So totally is luck, rather than adaption. What would you say if
>>> Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is just stupid? Or what if
>>> Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration didn't?
>>> Anyway, there are probably arguments for and against what I'm saying,
>>> doesn't really matter.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
