Re: hi
- From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:57:01 +0200
I'd prefer to grab everything before Friday, so if you could pack
everything on Thursday, I'll collect it after work.
Thanks bro :)
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> @Sap.
> I only get finished at 6.
> I can set you up with the consoles and 1 screen. If you get the other one
> at Jeeva's, that's 2.
> I'll pack the goods for you to collect, just give me a time.
> On 5 Mar 2014 09:23, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> yeah man 5 o clock is too steep. I can try for 6:30.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:20:09 +0200
>> Subject: Re: hi
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Understandable bro. I could use the console, but then I'd require an
>> additional screen...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I can help out with a console if you need it, but there is no way I can
>> make 5pm on a work day.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>> *Sent:* 05 March 2014 9:14 AM
>>
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: hi
>>
>>
>>
>> This Friday Di.
>>
>>
>>
>> Finally heard back from Genshiken:
>>
>>
>>
>> "Hi Ryan,
>>
>>
>>
>> It should start at 17:00 in Molly Blackburn Hall's foyer.
>>
>>
>>
>> We believe that around 6-8 consoles would be sufficient. Should you
>> require any more, please let us know, and we can try to rouse up a few more
>> from our committee members."
>>
>>
>>
>> Nic and Lindsey indicated that they'd be able to help out. Anyone else?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> When is the event?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> The event will be at held at the UCT sports center. Genshiken wants to
>> run a Tekken tourney and also have some other games running on the side.
>> Clint aka Zombie Dredd will also be there doing his own thing.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm just waiting for feedback on how many consoles will be required and
>> what time the event starts.
>>
>>
>>
>> Who's interested in attending?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> green hand so spammable now its unbelievable. gg
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTG4lAVl4QU
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 20:33:07 +0200
>> Subject: Re: hi
>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> This Friday?
>> My consoles are your consoles bro.
>> Hit me up with details when you get them.
>>
>> On 4 Mar 2014 20:03, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> *lol* Gettin schooled by the prof... classic :P
>>
>>
>>
>> Got the following message from Genshiken:
>>
>>
>>
>> "Hi there Ryan,
>>
>> Would you and CTS be interested in helping us host a gaming event on
>> Friday at all, should you be available?"
>>
>>
>>
>> Waiting for specifics.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Lol, I told him but come on, the guy isn't really going to attend
>> every weekend. Maybe he'll come to a CTS though.
>>
>> He used my hori, I used pad.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Kevin is OP
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4 March 2014 18:18, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> What controller did he use.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:17 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Let him know about the sessions. He sounds legit.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I was seriously shocked. He had feint cancels and everything.
>>
>> Then again, he is asian, so it makes sense.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:07 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> That awkward moment when your professor schools you.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Was playing AE with Skamanke today.This guy and his backdash button
>> -_-
>>
>> Anyway, got to my supervisor for another meeting and he saw my hori and
>> was like "wow! You have a joystick?"
>>
>> I'm like "yeah, just for some fun", obviously I wasn't just going to go
>> all into it with my prof. He is like "Fun? You should play Mark of the
>> Wolves or The Last Blade. Those are real games, made by SNK. No Capcom
>> rubbish"
>>
>> We played.
>>
>> The guy has combos... His Kevin is broken -_-
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Not sure
>>
>> But it seems like it roughly.
>>
>> Used to able to run MP7-8
>>
>> Now Torment 2 seems to be the sweet spot me atm.
>>
>>
>> Game work differently tho so its hard to directly compare.
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: hi
>>
>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:45:28 +0000
>>
>>
>>
>> Is master lvl = mp3 , torment 1 =5?
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: hi
>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:06:47 +0000
>>
>> Arcane Power on Crit
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 15:00:17 +0200
>> Subject: Re: hi
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Apoc?
>>
>>
>>
>> Yeah, i think it's fair that blizzard nerfed the whole perma-mindless
>> spam build. It makes the game a bit boring. I like how the new patch
>> introduced so many new different types of builds. At one point everyone is
>> basically the same lolz but now you can have fun a bit.
>>
>>
>>
>> To bad they fixed the WD more than 10 zombie dog bug. (The bug is that,
>> zombie dogs that didn't spawn from the "Zombie Dog" skill itself doesn't
>> count towards max zombie dogs allowed. So passive and other skills that
>> gives zombie dogs when a monster dies stays...) saw a vid with 10 zombie
>> dogs. looks fun :) I think they removed this bug because it cause
>> performance issue...i mean just the 0 CD with 3 zombie dog build is already
>> stifling performance of the game.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Damage and build variety is waaaaay better from the looks of it.
>>
>> Perma builds got nerfed ofcourse like everybody. Perma freeze or Perma
>> Archon etc. and Apoc in general
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:43:47 +0200
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: hi
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Poor WD lolz
>>
>>
>>
>> didn't they nerf Wiz too?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> http://eu.battle.net/d3/en/forum/2823159/
>>
>> Problem is that with the new patch there are far too many people posting
>> 'builds' that are just their random choice of skills.
>>
>> Dunno exactly how thing are going but Monk/Wiz > DH/Barb. Don't care how
>> the WD is doing.
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:31 PM
>>
>>
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: hi
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> How's monk in 2.0.1? i'm still not feeling the class...maybe i just don't
>> like their playstyle :/ What new builds do they have other than dashing
>> strike, bells, cyclone?
>>
>>
>>
>> DH looks very good in 2.0.1 now. Will main DH now :)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:28 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Il play monk to get paragon and keys. I want to play somethng difrent
>> nw. Helfire rings r op in 2.0.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: hi
>>
>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:24:37 +0000
>>
>>
>>
>> Also LB, don't be playing the Barb expecting to be OP or anything. A lot
>> of the casual Barb players are migrating to Monk because he's so much
>> stronger now than the Barb.
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:22 PM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>
>>
>>
>> Sap is playing wizard. I had to resort to using follower coz i kept dying
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: hi
>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:20:09 +0000
>>
>> Wizard!
>>
>>
>> Frozen orb is boss
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: hi
>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:14:37 +0000
>>
>> Don't worry too much about them because you can always reset them.
>>
>> Go with res-all before +% life.
>> Your movement speed (total, including equip) should be +25%. I get 12%
>> from Inna Pants, 12% from Lacuni and 1% from paragon levels.
>> Go with attack speed.
>>
>> Depending on your build, some other things change - like whether you want
>> splash damage.
>>
>> The Barb has been nerfed massively, especially in comparison to the Monk.
>> Don't expect your Barb to be unkillable anymore. Also don't expect any
>> perma-builds.
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:06 PM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>
>>
>>
>> Aah okay i see thanks. I duno where to put my paragon levels, everythng
>> luks gud.
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: hi
>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:00:29 +0000
>>
>> Oh wait, are you talking about a WW Barb? I thought you meant the twirly
>> Monk thing.
>>
>> Viable WW builds now? Uh, not really there. Well, you can get them, but
>> you need to be properly equipped.
>>
>> Previously you used Battle Rage > Into the Fray so that crit hits
>> generated fury. Then WoTB > Thrive on Chaos allowed you to add time to WoTB
>> for fury generated.
>> As long as you had crit chance of around 40% unbuffed, your passives and
>> skills could push this past 80%. That meant you'd never run out of fury as
>> long as you hit enough people fast enough.
>>
>> HoTA - crit chance higher if you've got full fury - meant that my crit
>> chance was around 95% for HoTA.
>>
>> For WW barb, you added the WW rune that lets you attack at your movement
>> speed. Then you add Sprint with the Tornados. They proc'd enough to
>> generate your non-stop fury. WW dealt the damage to kill. Throw in Rend to
>> make you Immortal and you're good to go.
>>
>> A proper working WW barb would set you back only around 50m.
>>
>>
>> TL:DR - these builds no longer work - you can't generate fury from crit
>> hits. L2P
>>
>> Superstition is a great passive now for fury generation. Against
>> elemental elites, you will never run out of fury. You can perma-HoTA them.
>> As long as your fury spent to life is high enough, you can live doing this.
>>
>> http://us.battle.net/d3/en/calculator/barbarian#ahdRSk!hYe!ZcYcZb
>>
>> That's the sort of thing you should go for if you want a WW build these
>> days.
>>
>> Also, the Barbarian is not a ballerina. Stop using WW.
>>
>> Also, your BB is level 26 or some crap. Come back when you're max level
>> and we'll talk again. There are no builds for low level Barbs. Get level
>> reduced gear and shove gems in there.
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 1:44 PM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>
>>
>>
>> Ya fkn paye registration. U need to give me info on keeping up that spin
>> dammit.
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: hi
>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:40:07 +0000
>>
>> You physically go to SARS? You do know that you can do your tax online,
>> right? Also your company should send the IRP5s straight to SARS to
>> pre-populate the tax fields. Takes me about 5 minutes to do my tax every
>> year.
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 04 March 2014 1:38 PM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>
>>
>>
>> Why is sars so kuk full wtf? Im running outa mana quick when i spin. How
>> did ppl keep up the spin for so long in vanilla d3?
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:12:59 +0200
>> Subject: Re: hi
>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> > What would you say if Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is
>> just stupid? Or what if Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration
>> didn't?
>>
>> You're overcomplicating it and looking at it in the wrong way. Remember,
>> Infiltration was just reacting to Sanford Kelly. He was just remembered
>> the situation from before and progressively punished harder after getting
>> hit by it once. There wasn't a big tactical aspect behind it. He just
>> adapted to what Sanford was doing. There's no luck involved either. Given
>> the number of options players have at that range, it's extremely hard to
>> perform a counter on reaction. You have to place that counter higher in
>> your memory bank. Remember how we played once and you hit me with a focus
>> attack, and then afterwards I kept punishing it with an Ultra? Same
>> thing. The difference is that the way Infiltration handled it there was no
>> easy way for him to get baited into punishing incorrectly. cr.mk xx
>> tatsu would work even if Sanford Kelly backdashed, so would cr.hk xx
>> demon.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I suppose "I don't know".
>>
>> Pah, I know it sounds silly but if I changed what I did every time I got
>> hit by something, I'm not respecting the fact the guy probably has
>> something else up his sleeve to "counter my counter".
>>
>> I just use a "penalty shootout" mentality to deal with mixups. If I
>> always go left as goalie, whether you know it or not, eventually you will
>> shoot left, at least once, even if you KNOW shooting right seems to be the
>> best option. Its called probability matching, and its generally inherent in
>> any living organism.
>>
>> Anyway, after the blocked shot, the general option by the shooter will be
>> to switch back to the winning option... but that is when the goalie changes
>> too! This usually shatters the morale of the shooter... or at least gives
>> me a nice comfortable spot "inside his head", although I didn't do a single
>> thing.
>>
>> Its the same reason that I prefer to "air to air" a guy then use an
>> anti-air, because that means I 'knew' you were going to jump and that is
>> scary. DP could just be from reaction.
>>
>>
>> TL:DR, I try and get you used to be me being silly and then turn smart.
>> It catches you unawares and you lose the match :-)
>>
>> Doesn't work on guys who stick to their guns though.
>>
>> So totally is luck, rather than adaption. What would you say if
>> Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is just stupid? Or what if
>> Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration didn't?
>>
>> Anyway, there are probably arguments for and against what I'm saying,
>> doesn't really matter.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hi
- From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir
Other related posts:
