RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:53:49 +0000
I get that the first one is a paradox. The second one is only a paradox if time
is continuous.
If time in not continuous, then motion is an illusion made up of infinite
instances of non-motion.
I suppose it just comes down to which side of the debate you fall on. Since
most physics is time-reversal invariant, it shouldn't matter whether or not
time is continuous or whether it flows forward and motion exists. All fine,
unless you really love your second law of thermodynamics...
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ilitirit Sama
Sent: 13 February 2014 12:43 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
The first one produces a paradox when you try to perform calculations on limits
(same as Lumi's example).
Second produces a paradox because even though all the statements are true, the
reality is different.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
That's not a paradox though, that's the question as to whether time is
continuous.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Ilitirit Sama
Sent: 13 February 2014 12:33 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Haha actually that wasn't one of Zeno's paradoxes. It's related to the
paradoxes of limits that Lumi posted though.
Zeno's paradox about motion went something like this:
If motion can be broken down into instances, and instances are durations where
no motion takes place and no time passes, how can motion take place at all?
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Always "works" because infinity is undefined.
I like Zeno's paradoxes.
It always takes a finite amount of time greater than zero to move between any
two points.
There are an infinite number of points between any two points.
Therefore, it takes an infinite amount of time to move between two points
Therefore, motion is impossible.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:09 PM, sameegh jardine
<sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
In the spirit of the interesting idea that was posted yesterday, here's a nifty
paradox:
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/37327/infinity-1-paradox
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:05 PM, sameegh jardine
<sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I think I knocked him out at a previous CTS tourney.
Don't think he should be added to the mails yet, if he's actually serious about
fighters then cool. But we've seen too many examples of randoms being added and
then never seeing or hearing from them.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:58 AM, G B
<sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Well, you may be in disbelief than LB.
He is coming to the session. I should add him to the mails though.
We've been playing for a bit now.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:43 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I dnt believe the sleepyforest wil say such things.
________________________________
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:35:30 +0200
Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hey guys. Just chilling with SleepingForest9.
Says that ChunLi sticks are gay and so is Chun. So yeah, its a ft10 against
Lumi.
Just letting you guys know.
On 11 Feb 2014 18:47, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:
LOL. STFU man! :-D
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:52 PM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
ROFLMAO
the new fragrance by GB
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:41:10 +0200
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> DKNY
> Don't Know Nothing You
> =========================================================================
> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
**********************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
Other related posts:
