* If ST was a person it would be Nick , old but still as fierce as ever. * On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:19 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Im pretty sure you are gna be stuck at doing qcf qcb qcfx2, dp motions. > converting from tekken to sf is being comfortable in doing those motions. > Ryu has all of these motions. once you have gone passed the "how do I do > these motions phase" you can get on your way to playing the game and not > focussing on the controller. > > > > http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/feb/10/early-entrance-numbers-socal-regionals-2014-game-ssf4-ae-v2012-umvc3-smash-blazblue-and-more/ > > All the 3d fighters are scoring low numbers, except for injustice, dunno > when that train is gna die. ST is still going strong. If ST was a person it > would be Nick , old but still as fierce as ever. BB is gna be HYPE YALL > WOOOOOOOOPPPP. so glad its getting the attention it deserves. > SoCal Regionals 2014 early registration numbers > *Numbers as of February 10, 2014 5:35 p.m. PST* > > Super Street Fighter 4 Arcade Edition v2012 - 173 > Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 - 105 > Blazblue: Chrono Phantasma - 66 > Injustice: Gods Among Us - 59 > Killer Instinct - 45 > Super Smash Bros. Melee - 36 > King of Fighters 13 - 35 > Street Fighter X Tekken - 34 > Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo - 31 > Divekick - 30 > Persona 4: Arena - 29 > Tekken Tag Tournament 2 - 28 > Guilty Gear Accent Core +R - 25 > Dead or Alive 5 Ultimate - 21 > Mortal Kombat 9 - 21 > Skullgirls - 21 > Soul Calibur 2 HD - 18 > Soul Calibur 5 - 18 > Mobile Suit Gundam Extreme: Vs Full Boost - 17 > Virtua Fighter 5: Final Showdown - 13 > > > ------------------------------ > From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:01:48 +0200 > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Ah ok. No doubt on Ryu. But he's the cover boy for the game lolz > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > Ryu's not actually a "simple" character. He's just easy to learn the game > with because you're forced to learn everything to use him effectively. > > Boxer, Guile and Honda are more simple because they have movesets with > less risk attached (Dash Punch, Sonic Boom, Head butt) so you don't have to > worry so much about how and when to use these moves, and what your > alternatives are when your opponent can shut these moves down. > > On the other hand, Ryu's fireball is only safe in certain situations. > Learning to throw fireballs with Ryu is deceptively hard. > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ryu can suck it. too mainstream lolz if you notice my characters in every > fighting game is either characters that nobody plays, chinese or they have > tits...haha best would be a combination of 3 XD oh and Capos :) > > but yes i know that ryu is pretty straight forward and probably the best > to start out with for a new player. But meh, i'll take my chances with the > characters i find interesting. I mean i didn't start tekken with mishimas > or Asuka. I went for Capos, Julia, Nina/Anna, Raven, Yoshi and all the > weirdos. Still don't know how to play mishimas and do ewgf haha can do > "turtle ho" tho...aka slow ass f~d~df+2...fuck just frame. > > thanks for all the input. i've been reading lots but now i just need to > put it into execution :) > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:37 PM, lindsey kiviets > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > not all shotos are eay to play. > > ryu is best to start with. > > ------------------------------ > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:34:04 +0000 > > > Fuck that shit > > Was also told to start with a shoto. Tried it and hated it. Fuck all > shotos. > > Just play who you like > > ------------------------------ > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:28:22 +0000 > > Di when learning sf4 , pickup ryu. best advice I can give you. > > I didn't like the game at al , but after I played with ryu for a lengthy > period the game started to make sense. Chojin beat the living cwap outa me > with his ryu , it forced me to level and learn the game. > > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:22:21 +0200 > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Probably Yun. You'll need a bit of practice for his Genei Jin combos but > they are pretty straight forward. No fireballs though. > > Juri is one of the best zoners in the game, but her projectile storing > mechanic takes a long time to get used to. Doesn't have a DP for anti-air, > but has one of the best anti-air normals in the game. > > Dhalsim is quite simple to learn and very effective but his playstyle is > unique. His ground game is probably the least like Ryus. No DP, but you > can't really jump on him. > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Quick question, who in this list is "easy" to play (as in easy combo and > simple mechanic/fighting philosophy eg. ryu? fireball projectile and > zoning, shoryuken for anti air, etc) > > Juri, El Fuerte, Yun, Dhalsim? > > El Fuerte looks a bit complicated with his infinite combo :/ but i won't > know until i try it out. Yun looks pretty straight forward. While i had > some practice with Juri, so i kindda know her movelist. > > Gonna start SF4 :) while i wait for Elena. > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, lindsey kiviets > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > doubt it , MS is too cheap. > > they didn't even fyt for DH when they got bought out. > > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:21:01 +0000 > > > Well Tekken just isn't hype. Too few entries. > I wonder if MS paid for KI to be there, like Warner Bros did with MK and > Injustice. > *From*: lindsey kiviets [mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx] > *Sent*: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:03 AM South Africa Standard Time > *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > *Subject*: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > he just mad salty, but its not as if Tekken wont be there at all. It will > still be there just not on the main stage. > > I don't agree with Mr Wizards decision putting KI in though , Tekken > could've been in there. > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:41:17 +0200 > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I agree with SAP, MM is a douch... > On 10 Feb 2014 13:29, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I remember him getting into a fight on TZ with Aken. > It was quite funny with MM claiming that Aken didn't know how to play Kaz. > Right... > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong > *Sent:* 10 February 2014 1:21 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > Agree on MainMan... > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Ashraf, just use June against him *lol* > > MainMan is an idiot. > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ashraf Barendse < > ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > FT5 salty runback? Sure thing. > > But I apologise in advance to the other guys if it's not fun to watch, > since it's going to be a very one sided affair in my favor. > > MainMan butthurt about no TTT2 at Evo. I get it, but why diss Marvel? > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aldEXN1gJII > ========================================================================= > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list. > > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > > >
Attachment:
Um, yeah.jpg
Description: JPEG image
