Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

  • From: Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:01:48 +0200

Ah ok. No doubt on Ryu. But he's the cover boy for the game lolz


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ryu's not actually a "simple" character.  He's just easy to learn the game
> with because you're forced to learn everything to use him effectively.
>
> Boxer, Guile and Honda are more simple because they have movesets with
> less risk attached (Dash Punch, Sonic Boom, Head butt) so you don't have to
> worry so much about how and when to use these moves, and what your
> alternatives are when your opponent can shut these moves down.
>
> On the other hand, Ryu's fireball is only safe in certain situations.
> Learning to throw fireballs with Ryu is deceptively hard.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> ryu can suck it. too mainstream lolz if you notice my characters in every
>> fighting game is either characters that nobody plays, chinese or they have
>> tits...haha best would be a combination of 3 XD oh and Capos :)
>>
>> but yes i know that ryu is pretty straight forward and probably the best
>> to start out with for a new player. But meh, i'll take my chances with the
>> characters i find interesting. I mean i didn't start tekken with mishimas
>> or Asuka. I went for Capos, Julia, Nina/Anna, Raven, Yoshi and all the
>> weirdos. Still don't know how to play mishimas and do ewgf haha can do
>> "turtle ho" tho...aka slow ass f~d~df+2...fuck just frame.
>>
>> thanks for all the input. i've been reading lots but now i just need to
>> put it into execution :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:37 PM, lindsey kiviets 
>> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>> not all shotos are eay to play.
>>>
>>> ryu is best to start with.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:34:04 +0000
>>>
>>>
>>> Fuck that shit
>>>
>>> Was also told to start with a shoto.  Tried it and hated it.  Fuck all
>>> shotos.
>>>
>>> Just play who you like
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:28:22 +0000
>>>
>>> Di when learning sf4 , pickup ryu. best advice I can give you.
>>>
>>> I didn't like the game at al , but after I played with ryu for a lengthy
>>> period the game started to make sense. Chojin beat the living cwap outa me
>>> with his ryu , it forced me to level and learn the game.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:22:21 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Probably Yun.  You'll need a bit of practice for his Genei Jin combos
>>> but they are pretty straight forward.  No fireballs though.
>>>
>>> Juri is one of the best zoners in the game, but her projectile storing
>>> mechanic takes a long time to get used to.  Doesn't have a DP for anti-air,
>>> but has one of the best anti-air normals in the game.
>>>
>>> Dhalsim is quite simple to learn and very effective but his playstyle is
>>> unique.  His ground game is probably the least like Ryus.  No DP, but you
>>> can't really jump on him.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Quick question, who in this list is "easy" to play (as in easy combo and
>>> simple mechanic/fighting philosophy eg. ryu? fireball projectile and
>>> zoning, shoryuken for anti air, etc)
>>>
>>> Juri, El Fuerte, Yun, Dhalsim?
>>>
>>> El Fuerte looks a bit complicated with his infinite combo :/ but i won't
>>> know until i try it out. Yun looks pretty straight forward. While i had
>>> some practice with Juri, so i kindda know her movelist.
>>>
>>> Gonna start SF4 :) while i wait for Elena.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> doubt it , MS is too cheap.
>>>
>>> they didn't even fyt for DH when they got bought out.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:21:01 +0000
>>>
>>>
>>> Well Tekken just isn't hype. Too few entries.
>>> I wonder if MS paid for KI to be there, like Warner Bros did with MK and
>>> Injustice.
>>>  *From*: lindsey kiviets [mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> *Sent*: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:03 AM South Africa Standard Time
>>> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> *Subject*: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>
>>>
>>>  he just mad salty, but its not as if Tekken wont be there at all. It
>>> will still be there just not on the main stage.
>>>
>>> I don't agree with Mr Wizards decision putting KI in though , Tekken
>>> could've been in there.
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:41:17 +0200
>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> I agree with SAP, MM is a douch...
>>> On 10 Feb 2014 13:29, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  I remember him getting into a fight on TZ with Aken.
>>> It was quite funny with MM claiming that Aken didn't know how to play
>>> Kaz. Right...
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>> *Sent:* 10 February 2014 1:21 PM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>
>>>  Agree on MainMan...
>>>
>>>  On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Ashraf, just use June against him *lol*
>>>
>>>  MainMan is an idiot.
>>>
>>>  On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> FT5 salty runback? Sure thing.
>>>
>>> But I apologise in advance to the other guys if it's not fun to watch,
>>> since it's going to be a very one sided affair in my favor.
>>>
>>> MainMan butthurt about no TTT2 at Evo. I get it, but why diss Marvel?
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aldEXN1gJII
>>>
>>> =========================================================================
>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>>>
>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>   ------------------------------
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Other related posts: